NestJS vs Padrino: What are the differences?
Developers describe NestJS as "A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient and scalable server-side applications by @kammysliwiec". Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming)
Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available.. On the other hand, Padrino is detailed as "A powerful full-featured ruby framework built on top of the Sinatra". Padrino is a ruby framework built upon the excellent Sinatra Microframework. Padrino was created to make it fun and easy to code more advanced web applications while still adhering to the spirit that makes Sinatra great!.
NestJS and Padrino belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.
"Powerful but super friendly to work with" is the top reason why over 7 developers like NestJS, while over 3 developers mention "Microframework" as the leading cause for choosing Padrino.
NestJS and Padrino are both open source tools. It seems that NestJS with 17.4K GitHub stars and 1.22K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Padrino with 3.21K GitHub stars and 497 GitHub forks.