WebSharper vs NestJS: What are the differences?
Developers describe WebSharper as "Full-stack, functional reactive web programming for .NET". Develop microservices, client-server web applications, reactive SPAs, and more in C# or F#. Bind composite data models to your reactive user interfaces
The flow of reactive values through the code is explicit yet concise, for maximum readability.. On the other hand, NestJS is detailed as "A progressive Node.js framework for building efficient and scalable server-side applications by @kammysliwiec". Nest is a framework for building efficient, scalable Node.js server-side applications. It uses progressive JavaScript, is built with TypeScript (preserves compatibility with pure JavaScript) and combines elements of OOP (Object Oriented Programming), FP (Functional Programming), and FRP (Functional Reactive Programming)
Under the hood, Nest makes use of Express, but also, provides compatibility with a wide range of other libraries, like e.g. Fastify, allowing for easy use of the myriad third-party plugins which are available..
WebSharper and NestJS can be primarily classified as "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools.
Some of the features offered by WebSharper are:
- Functional, reactive applications with WebSharper.UI
- Model-View-Update architecture with WebSharper.Mvu
- Build React components
On the other hand, NestJS provides the following key features:
- Extensible - Gives you true flexibility by allowing use of any other libraries thanks to modular architecture.
- Versatile - An adaptable ecosystem that is a fully-fledged backbone for all kinds of server-side applications.
- Progressive - Takes advantage of latest JavaScript features, bringing design patterns and mature solutions to node.js world.
NestJS is an open source tool with 24.6K GitHub stars and 1.98K GitHub forks. Here's a link to NestJS's open source repository on GitHub.
