StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Concurrency Frameworks
  5. Netty vs OkHttp

Netty vs OkHttp

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Netty
Netty
Stacks264
Followers408
Votes17
GitHub Stars34.6K
Forks16.2K
OkHttp
OkHttp
Stacks74
Followers92
Votes0

Netty vs OkHttp: What are the differences?

Comparison between Netty and OkHttp

Netty and OkHttp are popular libraries used for network communication in Java-based applications. While both provide similar functionalities, there are some key differences that set them apart.

  1. Thread Model: Netty is known for its event-driven, non-blocking I/O model, making it suitable for high-performance applications. It employs a small number of threads to handle a large number of connections through asynchronous I/O operations. On the other hand, OkHttp uses a traditional thread-per-connection model, making it simpler to use but not as efficient as Netty when handling a large number of concurrent connections.

  2. Protocol Support: Netty is a versatile library that supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, WebSocket, and SSL/TLS. It provides a low-level API to handle various protocols efficiently by allowing developers to customize the communication pipeline. In contrast, OkHttp specializes in HTTP and HTTPS communication, providing a high-level API with built-in features such as request/response caching, authentication, and connection pooling.

  3. Flexibility vs. Ease of Use: Netty offers a high degree of flexibility and customization options. Developers can fine-tune the behavior of the network stack and design complex network protocols. However, this flexibility comes at the cost of a steeper learning curve and more effort required to set up and configure. OkHttp, on the other hand, prioritizes ease of use and provides a simpler, more intuitive API. It abstracts away many low-level details, making it easier for developers to get started quickly.

  4. Concurrency Model: Netty provides explicit support for handling concurrency through its event-driven architecture. It enables developers to build highly scalable applications with efficient utilization of system resources. OkHttp, although it supports concurrent requests, does not offer the same level of customization and control over concurrency as Netty.

  5. Server-side Capabilities: Netty is designed to primarily serve as a network application framework for building servers. It provides a robust set of server-side features and utilities, making it suitable for building scalable and high-performance server applications. In contrast, OkHttp is primarily aimed at client-side HTTP communication, although it can be used for server-side scenarios as well.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Netty is a widely adopted and mature library that has been around since 2004. It has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, examples, and third-party integrations. OkHttp, although a relatively newer library, is backed by the same team that maintains other popular libraries like Retrofit and Moshi. It benefits from the overall ecosystem and community support of these libraries.

In Summary, Netty and OkHttp offer different trade-offs in terms of performance, flexibility, ease of use, and protocol support. Developers should consider their specific requirements and use cases when choosing between these two libraries for network communication in Java applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Netty
Netty
OkHttp
OkHttp

Netty is a NIO client server framework which enables quick and easy development of network applications such as protocol servers and clients. It greatly simplifies and streamlines network programming such as TCP and UDP socket server.

HTTP is the way modern applications network. It’s how we exchange data & media. Doing HTTP efficiently makes your stuff load faster and saves bandwidth.

-
HTTP/2 support allows all requests to the same host to share a socket.;Connection pooling reduces request latency (if HTTP/2 isn’t available).;Transparent GZIP shrinks download sizes.;Response caching avoids the network completely for repeat requests
Statistics
GitHub Stars
34.6K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
16.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
264
Stacks
74
Followers
408
Followers
92
Votes
17
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    High Performance
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Just like it
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    Limited resources to learn from
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to Netty, OkHttp?

Postman

Postman

It is the only complete API development environment, used by nearly five million developers and more than 100,000 companies worldwide.

Paw

Paw

Paw is a full-featured and beautifully designed Mac app that makes interaction with REST services delightful. Either you are an API maker or consumer, Paw helps you build HTTP requests, inspect the server's response and even generate client code.

Akka

Akka

Akka is a toolkit and runtime for building highly concurrent, distributed, and resilient message-driven applications on the JVM.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Appwrite

Appwrite

Appwrite's open-source platform lets you add Auth, DBs, Functions and Storage to your product and build any application at any scale, own your data, and use your preferred coding languages and tools.

Runscope

Runscope

Keep tabs on all aspects of your API's performance with uptime monitoring, integration testing, logging and real-time monitoring.

Orleans

Orleans

Orleans is a framework that provides a straightforward approach to building distributed high-scale computing applications, without the need to learn and apply complex concurrency or other scaling patterns. It was created by Microsoft Research and designed for use in the cloud.

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia REST Client

Insomnia is a powerful REST API Client with cookie management, environment variables, code generation, and authentication for Mac, Window, and Linux.

RAML

RAML

RESTful API Modeling Language (RAML) makes it easy to manage the whole API lifecycle from design to sharing. It's concise - you only write what you need to define - and reusable. It is machine readable API design that is actually human friendly.

Apigee

Apigee

API management, design, analytics, and security are at the heart of modern digital architecture. The Apigee intelligent API platform is a complete solution for moving business to the digital world.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase