StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Next.js vs Rails API

Next.js vs Rails API

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails API
Rails API
Stacks95
Followers142
Votes16
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks275
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Next.js vs Rails API: What are the differences?

Introduction: In web development, choosing the right framework can significantly impact the efficiency and functionality of your project. Next.js and Rails API are two popular options for building web applications. Each framework has its unique features that cater to different needs. Below are the key differences between Next.js and Rails API.

1. Server-Side Rendering (SSR) Support: Next.js is a React framework that includes built-in support for server-side rendering, allowing pages to be pre-rendered on the server before sending them to the client. On the other hand, Rails API is primarily designed for building client-side applications and does not have native support for server-side rendering.

2. JavaScript vs. Ruby: Next.js is built with JavaScript and uses React for front-end development, while Rails API is based on the Ruby programming language. Developers familiar with JavaScript may find Next.js more straightforward to work with, whereas those with experience in Ruby may prefer Rails API.

3. Full-Stack vs. Backend Only: Next.js is a full-stack framework that covers both front-end and back-end development, making it a comprehensive solution for building web applications. Rails API, on the other hand, is a backend-only framework that focuses on providing APIs for client-side applications, requiring additional tools for front-end development.

4. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources available. Rails API also has a strong community backing, but it may not be as extensive as the Next.js community. Depending on your project requirements, the availability of community support can be a crucial factor in choosing a framework.

5. File Structure and Convention: Next.js follows a conventions-over-configuration approach, providing a predefined file structure and naming conventions to streamline development. Rails API also follows conventions, but its file structure is more opinionated compared to Next.js, which may limit flexibility for developers who prefer more freedom in organizing their codebase.

6. Scalability and Performance: Next.js offers built-in optimizations for performance, such as automatic code splitting and pre-fetching, which can improve the speed and scalability of web applications. While Rails API can be optimized for performance, it may require more manual configuration and additional tools compared to the out-of-the-box optimizations offered by Next.js.

In Summary, Next.js and Rails API differ in server-side rendering support, programming languages, full-stack capabilities, community support, file structure conventions, and performance optimizations. These differences should be considered when choosing a framework for your web development project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rails API, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails API
Rails API
Next.js
Next.js

Rails::API is a subset of a normal Rails application, created for applications that don't require all functionality that a complete Rails application provides. It is a bit more lightweight, and consequently a bit faster than a normal Rails application. The main example for its usage is in API applications only, where you usually don't need the entire Rails middleware stack nor template generation.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

-
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
275
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
95
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
142
Followers
5.1K
Votes
16
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Great for quick decoupled apps
  • 5
    Lightweight
  • 3
    Simply the best
  • 2
    Soon to be merged into core Rails 5
  • 1
    Logging by default
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
React
React

What are some alternatives to Rails API, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase