StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Total.js

Next.js vs Total.js

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.1K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
Total.js
Total.js
Stacks20
Followers62
Votes37
GitHub Stars4.4K
Forks446

Next.js vs Total.js: What are the differences?

Introduction: Next.js and Total.js are both popular web development frameworks for building web applications. While they share some similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart from each other.

  1. Rendering Approach: In Next.js, the server-side rendered pages are pre-rendered at build time, while Total.js is a server-side framework where pages are rendered dynamically on the server when requested by the client.

  2. Routing: Next.js uses file-system-based routing, where pages are automatically generated based on the file structure, while Total.js uses explicit routing configuration through route definitions in the application code.

  3. Data Fetching: Next.js provides multiple data fetching methods such as getStaticProps, getServerSideProps, and useSWR for fetching data on the client-side, whereas Total.js allows developers to fetch data using controllers or similar server-side logic.

  4. Client-side Rendering: Next.js allows for client-side rendering using technologies like React, enabling interactive user experiences, while Total.js primarily focuses on server-side rendering with limited support for client-side rendering.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js has a large and active community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins available, while Total.js, while still vibrant, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison.

  6. Scalability and Performance: Next.js is known for its scalability and performance, especially for larger applications, due to its ability to leverage features like automatic code splitting and server-side rendering optimization, whereas Total.js may require more manual optimization for performance at scale.

In Summary, Next.js and Total.js differ in their rendering approach, routing mechanisms, data fetching methods, support for client-side rendering, community size, and scalability/performance capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, Total.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
Total.js
Total.js

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

It is a Framework for Node.js platfrom written in pure JavaScript similar to PHP's Laravel or Python's Django or ASP.NET MVC

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Super fast development; Extremely low maintenance costs; Rock solid stability; Incredible performance; Easy scaling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
4.4K
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
446
Stacks
8.1K
Stacks
20
Followers
5.1K
Followers
62
Votes
330
Votes
37
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Pros
  • 5
    Rapid development
  • 5
    Fast
  • 4
    Low-code tools
  • 4
    Great support
  • 3
    Prebuild apps
Cons
  • 3
    Lack of source code documentation
  • 2
    Poor design - 4000 line files
  • 2
    Poor design
  • 2
    Poor community
  • 2
    Messes up global namespace and default prototypes
Integrations
React
React
npm
npm
Node.js
Node.js
PostGraphile
PostGraphile
Sentry
Sentry

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Total.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase