StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Vert.x

Next.js vs Vert.x

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vert.x
Vert.x
Stacks259
Followers325
Votes59
Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K

Next.js vs Vert.x: What are the differences?

Introduction

Next.js and Vert.x are two popular frameworks used for developing web applications. While Next.js is a React-based framework for building server-side rendered applications, Vert.x is a toolkit for building reactive and distributed systems on the Java Virtual Machine.

  1. Programming Language: One key difference between Next.js and Vert.x is the programming language they are built upon. Next.js is primarily built for JavaScript and React developers, making it easy for users already familiar with these technologies to get started. On the other hand, Vert.x is based on Java and supports multiple languages like JavaScript, Groovy, Ruby, and Scala, catering to a wider range of developers.

  2. Architecture: Another significant difference is in their architecture. Next.js follows a traditional server-side rendering model, where the server generates the HTML content and sends it to the client for rendering. In contrast, Vert.x is designed around an event-driven and non-blocking architecture, making it highly suitable for building reactive and asynchronous applications that can handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently.

  3. Scalability: When it comes to scalability, Vert.x has a clear advantage due to its event-driven architecture and non-blocking I/O operations. This allows Vert.x applications to scale easily to handle high loads without sacrificing performance. On the other hand, while Next.js can be scaled horizontally by deploying multiple instances, it may not be as efficient as Vert.x in handling extremely high traffic scenarios.

  4. Community and Ecosystem: Next.js benefits from the large and active React community, providing ample resources, libraries, and plugins for developers. In contrast, Vert.x has a smaller community compared to React-based frameworks, which may result in fewer resources and support available for developers using Vert.x.

Summary

In Summary, Next.js excels in simplicity and ease of use for JavaScript and React developers, while Vert.x offers a more versatile and scalable solution for building reactive and distributed applications in multiple languages.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Vert.x, Next.js

Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Vert.x
Vert.x
Next.js
Next.js

It is event driven and non blocking application framework. This means your app can handle a lot of concurrency using a small number of kernel threads. It lets your app scale with minimal hardware.

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

polygot; Simple concurrency model
Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
Stacks
259
Stacks
8.0K
Followers
325
Followers
5.1K
Votes
59
Votes
330
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Light weight
  • 12
    Fast
  • 8
    Java
  • 6
    Developers Are Super
  • 5
    Extensible
Cons
  • 2
    Too Many Conflicting Versions And Suggestions
  • 2
    Steep Learning Curve
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
Kotlin
Kotlin
Groovy
Groovy
React
React

What are some alternatives to Vert.x, Next.js?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase