StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Next.js vs Yew Framework

Next.js vs Yew Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Next.js
Next.js
Stacks8.0K
Followers5.1K
Votes330
GitHub Stars135.4K
Forks29.7K
Yew Framework
Yew Framework
Stacks24
Followers51
Votes0

Next.js vs Yew Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

Next.js and Yew Framework are both web development tools that offer different sets of features and functionality. Understanding their key differences is important for developers to choose the right tool for their projects.

  1. Server-side Rendering (SSR) Support: Next.js is a framework built on top of React that provides built-in server-side rendering support. This means that Next.js can render web pages on the server and send them as fully-rendered HTML to the client, resulting in faster page loads and better SEO. Yew Framework, on the other hand, is a modern Rust framework for creating web applications, but it does not have built-in server-side rendering support.

  2. Language: Next.js is written in JavaScript and supports both client-side and server-side JavaScript development. Yew Framework, on the other hand, is written in Rust, a systems programming language known for its speed and memory safety. This difference in programming language can affect developer productivity and the features available in each framework.

  3. Build Time Execution: Next.js allows developers to execute code during build time, which means developers can fetch data or perform other operations before deploying the application. This feature can be useful for pre-rendering static pages or optimizing performance. Yew Framework does not have built-in support for executing code during build time, and any server-side operations need to be performed at runtime.

  4. Size and Performance: Next.js, being built on top of React, introduces an additional layer of abstraction and dependencies, which can impact the bundle size and performance of the application. Yew Framework, being a Rust-based framework, has a smaller bundle size and can leverage the performance benefits of the Rust language. This can be particularly advantageous for applications that prioritize efficient resource usage and fast response times.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: Next.js benefits from the large and active React ecosystem and community. There are numerous resources, libraries, and tools available for developers to leverage when working with Next.js. Yew Framework, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller ecosystem and community compared to Next.js. This can affect availability of documentation, community support, and third-party libraries for Yew Framework.

  6. Development Workflow: Next.js provides a comprehensive development workflow with features like hot module replacement, automatic code splitting, and built-in support for CSS modules. Yew Framework, being built on Rust, brings with it the benefits of the Rust ecosystem, such as strong static typing, efficient memory management, and a powerful package manager (Cargo). This can result in a different development experience and workflow compared to Next.js.

In Summary, Next.js offers built-in server-side rendering support, is written in JavaScript, has build time execution capabilities, and benefits from a larger ecosystem and community. On the other hand, Yew Framework is a Rust-based framework, has a smaller bundle size and better performance, and leverages the benefits of Rust's language features and tooling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Next.js, Yew Framework

Yucen
Yucen

Feb 23, 2021

Decided

We choose Next.js for our React framework because it's very minimal and has a very organized file structure. Also, it offers key features like zero setups, automatic server rendering and code splitting, typescript support. Our app requires some loading time to process the video, server-side rendering will allow our website to display faster than client-side rending.

312k views312k
Comments
Taylor
Taylor

May 5, 2020

Review

Hey guys,

My backend set up is Prisma / GraphQL-Yoga at the moment, and I love it. It's so intuitive to learn and is really neat on the frontend too, however, there were a few gotchas when I was learning! Especially around understanding how it all pieces together (the stack). There isn't a great deal of information out there on exactly how to put into production my set up, which is a backend set up on a Digital Ocean droplet with Prisma/GraphQL Yoga in a Docker Container using Next & Apollo Client on the frontend somewhere else. It's such a niche subject, so I bet only a few hundred people have got a website with this stack in production. Anyway, I wrote a blog post to help those who might need help understanding it. Here it is, hope it helps!

758k views758k
Comments
Fronted
Fronted

Nov 23, 2020

Decided

We’re a new startup so we need to be able to deliver quick changes as we find our product market fit. We’ve also got to ensure that we’re moving money safely, and keeping perfect records. The technologies we’ve chosen mix mature but well maintained frameworks like Django, with modern web-first and api-first front ends like GraphQL, NextJS, and Chakra. We use a little Golang sparingly in our backend to ensure that when we interact with financial services, we do so with statically compiled, strongly typed, and strictly limited and reviewed code.

You can read all about it in our linked blog post.

720k views720k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Next.js
Next.js
Yew Framework
Yew Framework

Next.js is a minimalistic framework for server-rendered React applications.

A modern Rust framework inspired by Elm and ReactJS. This framework is designed to be compiled into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten.

Zero setup. Use the filesystem as an API; Only JavaScript. Everything is a function; Automatic server rendering and code splitting; Data fetching is up to the developer; Anticipation is the key to performance; Simple deployment
Compile into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten; Uses own virtual-dom representation; Put pure Rust code into HTML tags; Use single-line or multi-line Rust comments inside html-templates
Statistics
GitHub Stars
135.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
29.7K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
8.0K
Stacks
24
Followers
5.1K
Followers
51
Votes
330
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 51
    Automatic server rendering and code splitting
  • 44
    Built with React
  • 34
    Easy setup
  • 26
    TypeScript
  • 24
    Universal JavaScript
Cons
  • 9
    Structure is weak compared to Angular(2+)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
React
React
WebAssembly
WebAssembly
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to Next.js, Yew Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase