StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Traefik vs nginx

Traefik vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Traefik
Traefik
Stacks965
Followers1.2K
Votes93

Traefik vs nginx: What are the differences?

Traefik and Nginx are both popular reverse proxy servers and load balancers that are commonly used in web applications. While they have some similarities in terms of functionality, there are key differences between the two.

1. Configuration: Traefik uses a dynamic configuration approach, where it can automatically discover and configure backend services based on built-in providers like Docker, Kubernetes, and Consul. On the other hand, Nginx requires manual configuration through static configuration files that need to be updated every time a new backend service is added.

2. Routing: Traefik excels at dynamic and flexible routing based on various criteria like hostnames, paths, and headers. It allows for easy routing to different services based on URL patterns, making it ideal for microservices architectures. Nginx also supports routing but is more focused on efficiency and serving static content, making it better suited for traditional web server usage.

3. Ingress Controller: Traefik is designed to work as an Ingress controller for Kubernetes, providing advanced routing and load balancing capabilities. It integrates seamlessly with Kubernetes and allows for automatic configuration based on Kubernetes resources. Nginx can also be used as an Ingress controller but requires additional configuration and setup.

4. TLS Termination: Traefik comes with built-in support for Let's Encrypt, allowing for automatic generation and renewal of TLS certificates. It simplifies the process of securing websites with HTTPS by handling the certificate management automatically. Nginx requires manual generation and configuration of TLS certificates, making it more complex to set up HTTPS for websites.

5. Metrics and Monitoring: Traefik provides built-in metrics and monitoring through an integrated dashboard and supports integration with popular monitoring systems like Prometheus. Nginx does not have built-in monitoring capabilities and requires third-party tools for metrics and monitoring.

6. Flexibility: Traefik is designed to be lightweight and easy to use, making it a good choice for small to medium-sized deployments. It has a simple and intuitive API and supports hot reloading of configurations. Nginx, on the other hand, is more feature-rich and provides advanced configuration options, making it suitable for complex deployments and high-performance scenarios.

In summary, Traefik and Nginx offer similar functionalities as reverse proxy servers and load balancers, but they have key differences in terms of configuration, routing, Ingress controller support, TLS termination, metrics and monitoring, and flexibility. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and complexity of the deployment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Traefik

Gabriel
Gabriel

CEO at Naologic

Mar 16, 2020

DecidedonNGINXNGINXTraefikTraefik

We switched to Traefik so we can use the REST API to dynamically configure subdomains and have the ability to redirect between multiple servers.

We still use NGINX with a docker-compose to expose the traffic from our APIs and TCP microservices, but for managing routing to the internet Traefik does a much better job

The biggest win for naologic was the ability to set dynamic configurations without having to restart the server

1.42M views1.42M
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Howie
Howie

Full Stack Engineer at Yintrust

Aug 20, 2020

DecidedonTraefikTraefikcookiecuttercookiecutter

We use Traefik as the web server.

The reasons for choosing Traefik over Nginx are as follows:

  • Traefik built-in Let’s Encrypt and supports automatic renewal
  • Traefik automatically enables HTTP/2
  • Prometheus can be supported through simple Traefik configuration
  • @{cookiecutter}|tool:20075| django integrates Traefik's configuration by default
148k views148k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Traefik
Traefik

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.

-
Continuously updates its configuration (No restarts!); Supports multiple load balancing algorithms; Provides HTTPS to your microservices by leveraging Let's Encrypt (wildcard certificates support); Circuit breakers, retry; High Availability with cluster mode; See the magic through its clean web UI; Websocket, HTTP/2, GRPC ready; Provides metrics; Keeps access logs; Fast; Exposes a Rest API
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
965
Followers
61.9K
Followers
1.2K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
93
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 20
    Kubernetes integration
  • 18
    Watch service discovery updates
  • 14
    Letsencrypt support
  • 13
    Swarm integration
  • 12
    Several backends
Cons
  • 7
    Not very performant (fast)
  • 7
    Complicated setup
Integrations
No integrations available
Marathon
Marathon
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Docker
Docker
gRPC
gRPC
Let's Encrypt
Let's Encrypt
Google Kubernetes Engine
Google Kubernetes Engine
Consul
Consul
StatsD
StatsD
Docker Swarm
Docker Swarm

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Traefik?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

HAProxy

HAProxy

HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB)

With Elastic Load Balancing, you can add and remove EC2 instances as your needs change without disrupting the overall flow of information. If one EC2 instance fails, Elastic Load Balancing automatically reroutes the traffic to the remaining running EC2 instances. If the failed EC2 instance is restored, Elastic Load Balancing restores the traffic to that instance. Elastic Load Balancing offers clients a single point of contact, and it can also serve as the first line of defense against attacks on your network. You can offload the work of encryption and decryption to Elastic Load Balancing, so your servers can focus on their main task.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot