StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Localhost Tools
  5. Yarn vs ngrok

Yarn vs ngrok

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

ngrok
ngrok
Stacks420
Followers457
Votes57
GitHub Stars24.4K
Forks4.3K
Yarn
Yarn
Stacks28.2K
Followers13.5K
Votes151
GitHub Stars41.5K
Forks2.7K

Yarn vs ngrok: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Yarn and ngrok

Yarn and ngrok are both popular tools in the realm of software development and testing, but they serve different purposes and have distinct features that set them apart.

1. **Package Management**: Yarn is primarily a package manager that allows developers to download and manage dependencies for their projects, ensuring consistent and reliable builds. ngrok, on the other hand, is a tunneling service that exposes local servers to the internet, enabling secure testing and sharing of web applications.

2. **Platform Support**: Yarn is a JavaScript package manager specifically designed for Node.js projects, offering a faster and more efficient alternative to npm. In contrast, ngrok is a versatile tool that can be used with any programming language or framework, making it an excellent choice for various development environments.

3. **Functionality**: Yarn streamlines the process of installing, updating, and managing dependencies by leveraging a deterministic approach to package resolution. Meanwhile, ngrok simplifies the task of securely exposing local servers by creating secure tunnels and handling traffic redirection transparently.

4. **Usage Scenarios**: Yarn is ideal for developers who need to manage project dependencies efficiently and consistently across multiple environments. On the other hand, ngrok is perfect for testers and developers who require temporary public URLs for testing webhooks, APIs, or other services without deploying them to a live server.

5. **Security Considerations**: Yarn ensures the security of dependencies by generating lock files that specify exact versions to be installed, reducing the risk of vulnerabilities in the project. In comparison, ngrok employs secure tunnels and encryption protocols to safeguard data transmission between local servers and external clients.

6. **Community Support**: Yarn has a vibrant and active community that regularly contributes to its development and maintenance, ensuring a robust ecosystem of plugins and integrations. While ngrok also has a supportive community, it may not be as extensive as Yarn's, given its focus on specific use cases.

In Summary, Yarn excels in managing project dependencies efficiently for Node.js projects, while ngrok shines in securely exposing local servers to the internet for testing and sharing purposes across various programming environments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on ngrok, Yarn

StackShare
StackShare

Apr 23, 2019

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsnpmnpmYarnYarn

From a StackShare Community member: “I’m a freelance web developer (I mostly use Node.js) and for future projects I’m debating between npm or Yarn as my default package manager. I’m a minimalist so I hate installing software if I don’t need to- in this case that would be Yarn. For those who made the switch from npm to Yarn, what benefits have you noticed? For those who stuck with npm, are you happy you with it?"

294k views294k
Comments
zen-li
zen-li

Apr 24, 2019

ReviewonYarnYarn

p.s.

I am not sure about the performance of the latest version of npm, whether it is different from my understanding of it below. Because I use npm very rarely when I had the following knowledge.

------⏬

I use Yarn because, first, yarn is the first tool to lock the version. Second, although npm also supports the lock version, when you use npm to lock the version, and then use package-lock.json on other systems, package-lock.json Will be modified. You understand what I mean, when you deploy projects based on Git...

250k views250k
Comments
Oleksandr
Oleksandr

Senior Software Engineer at joyn

Dec 7, 2019

Decided

As we have to build the application for many different TV platforms we want to split the application logic from the device/platform specific code. Previously we had different repositories and it was very hard to keep the development process when changes were done in multiple repositories, as we had to synchronize code reviews as well as merging and then updating the dependencies of projects. This issues would be even more critical when building the project from scratch what we did at Joyn. Therefor to keep all code in one place, at the same time keeping in separated in different modules we decided to give a try to monorepo. First we tried out lerna which was fine at the beginning, but later along the way we had issues with adding new dependencies which came out of the blue and were not easy to fix. Next round of evolution was yarn workspaces, we are still using it and are pretty happy with dev experience it provides. And one more advantage we got when switched to yarn workspaces that we also switched from npm to yarn what improved the state of the lock file a lot, because with npm package-lock file was updated every time you run npm install, frequent updates of package-lock file were causing very often merge conflicts. So right now we not just having faster dependencies installation time but also no conflicts coming from lock file.

310k views310k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

ngrok
ngrok
Yarn
Yarn

ngrok is a reverse proxy that creates a secure tunnel between from a public endpoint to a locally running web service. ngrok captures and analyzes all traffic over the tunnel for later inspection and replay.

Yarn caches every package it downloads so it never needs to again. It also parallelizes operations to maximize resource utilization so install times are faster than ever.

Expose any http service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a subdomain of ngrok.com;Expose any tcp service behind a NAT or firewall to the internet on a random port of ngrok.com;Inspect all http requests/responses that are transmitted over the tunnel;Replay any request that was transmitted over the tunnel
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.4K
GitHub Stars
41.5K
GitHub Forks
4.3K
GitHub Forks
2.7K
Stacks
420
Stacks
28.2K
Followers
457
Followers
13.5K
Votes
57
Votes
151
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 26
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Super-fast
  • 7
    Free
  • 6
    Awesome traffic analysis page
  • 5
    Reliable custom domains
Cons
  • 5
    Doesn't Support UDP
  • 1
    El tunel SSH cambia de dominio constantemente
Pros
  • 85
    Incredibly fast
  • 22
    Easy to use
  • 13
    Open Source
  • 11
    Can install any npm package
  • 8
    Works where npm fails
Cons
  • 16
    Facebook
  • 7
    Sends data to facebook
  • 4
    Should be installed separately
  • 3
    Cannot publish to registry other than npm
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
GitHub
GitHub
Slack
Slack
JavaScript
JavaScript
npm
npm

What are some alternatives to ngrok, Yarn?

npm

npm

npm is the command-line interface to the npm ecosystem. It is battle-tested, surprisingly flexible, and used by hundreds of thousands of JavaScript developers every day.

RequireJS

RequireJS

RequireJS loads plain JavaScript files as well as more defined modules. It is optimized for in-browser use, including in a Web Worker, but it can be used in other JavaScript environments, like Rhino and Node. It implements the Asynchronous Module API. Using a modular script loader like RequireJS will improve the speed and quality of your code.

Browserify

Browserify

Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.

Component

Component

Component's philosophy is the UNIX philosophy of the web - to create a platform for small, reusable components that consist of JS, CSS, HTML, images, fonts, etc. With its well-defined specs, using Component means not worrying about most frontend problems such as package management, publishing components to a registry, or creating a custom build process for every single app.

Termius

Termius

The #1 cross-platform terminal with built-in ssh client which works as your own portable server management system in any situation.

GoTTY

GoTTY

GoTTY is a simple command line tool that turns your CLI tools into web applications.

Verdaccio

Verdaccio

A simple, zero-config-required local private npm registry. Comes out of the box with its own tiny database, and the ability to proxy other registries (eg. npmjs.org), caching the downloaded modules along the way.

pip

pip

It is the package installer for Python. You can use pip to install packages from the Python Package Index and other indexes.

PageKite

PageKite

PageKite is a system for exposing localhost servers to the public Internet. It is most commonly used to make local web servers or SSH servers publicly visible, although almost any TCP-based protocol can work if the client knows how to use an HTTP proxy.

MAMP

MAMP

It can be installed under macOS and Windows with just a few clicks. It provides them with all the tools they need to run WordPress on their desktop PC for testing or development purposes, for example. It doesn't matter if you prefer Apache or Nginx or if you want to work with PHP, Python, Perl or Ruby.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana