StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. OAuth2 vs RSA SecurID

OAuth2 vs RSA SecurID

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OAuth2
OAuth2
Stacks683
Followers650
Votes0
RSA SecurID
RSA SecurID
Stacks5
Followers15
Votes0

OAuth2 vs RSA SecurID: What are the differences?

Key differences between OAuth2 and RSA SecurID

OAuth2 and RSA SecurID are both authentication protocols widely used in information security, but they have key differences in terms of their implementation and features.

  1. Token-based vs. Symmetric Key: OAuth2 is a token-based authentication protocol that allows users to authorize third-party applications to access their protected resources without directly sharing their credentials. In contrast, RSA SecurID is a symmetric key-based authentication system that relies on a unique PIN and a time-based token generated by a physical or software token device.

  2. Access Granting Process: OAuth2 provides a standardized framework for granting limited access to a user's resources on behalf of a third-party application. It involves an authorization server, which issues access tokens to authorized applications after the user grants consent. On the other hand, RSA SecurID operates on a challenge-response mechanism, where the user enters their PIN followed by a token-generated number to authenticate.

  3. Scope of Usage: OAuth2 is primarily used for user authorization and access delegation in web and mobile applications. It allows users to authenticate with their existing credentials from various identity providers, such as Google or Facebook. In contrast, RSA SecurID is mainly employed for two-factor authentication in enterprise environments where an additional layer of security is required.

  4. Integration Complexity: Implementing OAuth2 requires developing an authorization server, client applications, and secure API endpoints. It involves coordinating between multiple parties and setting up communication protocols. In contrast, RSA SecurID has a more straightforward integration process as it only requires the deployment of the authentication server and token devices or software.

  5. Security Concerns: OAuth2 relies on the secrecy of access tokens, which can be compromised if not properly protected. However, its flexible authorization model allows for fine-grained control over resource access. RSA SecurID, on the other hand, provides a higher level of security by using time-based tokens and a PIN, making it more resistant to brute force and replay attacks.

  6. Usability and User Experience: OAuth2 offers a more user-friendly experience as users can easily grant and revoke access to their resources. It provides a simplified workflow for logging in to third-party applications without sharing credentials. RSA SecurID, although providing strong security, may be perceived as less convenient due to the additional step of entering the PIN and token-generated number during authentication.

In Summary, OAuth2 is a token-based authentication protocol used for authorization and access delegation in web and mobile applications, while RSA SecurID is a symmetric key-based two-factor authentication system primarily used in enterprise environments for additional security. OAuth2 focuses on user authorization, offers a simpler integration process, and provides a more user-friendly experience, whereas RSA SecurID offers higher security with its challenge-response mechanism and time-based tokens.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OAuth2
OAuth2
RSA SecurID
RSA SecurID

It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.

It is a mechanism developed by Security Dynamics for performing two-factor authentication for a user to a network resource.

-
Modern authentication; Access and SSO; Identity governance and lifecycle
Statistics
Stacks
683
Stacks
5
Followers
650
Followers
15
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to OAuth2, RSA SecurID?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope