StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. OAuth2 vs Spring Security

OAuth2 vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OAuth2
OAuth2
Stacks683
Followers650
Votes0
Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks559
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K

OAuth2 vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

OAuth2 and Spring Security are security frameworks that serve different purposes. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. OAuth2 Authorization Framework: OAuth2 is an open authorization framework used for securely authorizing access to resources. It allows applications to obtain limited access to user accounts using an access token. On the other hand, Spring Security is a powerful and highly customizable authentication and access control framework for Java applications.

  2. Grant Types: OAuth2 supports multiple grant types including authorization code, implicit, client credentials, and resource owner password credentials. Each grant type has different use cases and security considerations. Spring Security, on the other hand, provides a more flexible and extensible approach for handling authentication and authorization. It supports various authentication mechanisms such as in-memory, LDAP, JDBC, and more.

  3. Token-Based Authentication: OAuth2 uses tokens for authentication and authorization purposes. It issues access tokens, refresh tokens, and authorization codes to securely manage access to resources. Spring Security, on the other hand, supports various authentication mechanisms including token-based authentication using JSON Web Tokens (JWT).

  4. Integration with Third-Party Identity Providers: OAuth2 enables integration with third-party identity providers such as Google, Facebook, and Twitter. It allows applications to use OAuth2 to authenticate and authorize users using their existing accounts. Spring Security provides seamless integration with OAuth2, allowing developers to easily configure and manage the authentication process with external identity providers.

  5. Role-Based Access Control: Spring Security provides a robust role-based access control mechanism. Developers can define roles and permissions to restrict access to certain resources based on user roles. OAuth2, on the other hand, focuses more on authentication and authorization using tokens, and does not provide built-in support for role-based access control. However, OAuth2 can be used in combination with Spring Security to achieve role-based access control.

  6. Scalability and Integration: Spring Security offers a wide range of integrations with other frameworks and tools, making it highly scalable and adaptable to different types of applications. It provides seamless integration with Spring Framework, Spring Boot, and other Spring ecosystem components. OAuth2, on the other hand, is a standalone framework that can be integrated with any application or platform, making it suitable for a wide range of use cases and scenarios.

In summary, OAuth2 is an authorization framework that focuses on securely authorizing access to resources using tokens, while Spring Security is a flexible authentication and access control framework for Java applications with built-in support for various authentication mechanisms, role-based access control, and integrations with other frameworks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on OAuth2, Spring Security

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

OAuth2
OAuth2
Spring Security
Spring Security

It is an authorization framework that enables a third-party application to obtain limited access to an HTTP service, either on behalf of a resource owner by orchestrating an approval interaction between the resource owner and the HTTP service, or by allowing the third-party application to obtain access on its own behalf.

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

-
Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
Stacks
683
Stacks
559
Followers
650
Followers
589
Votes
0
Votes
6
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Java integration
Integrations
No integrations available
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC

What are some alternatives to OAuth2, Spring Security?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope