StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Image Optimization
  4. Image Processing And Management
  5. OpenCV vs OpenFace

OpenCV vs OpenFace

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenCV
OpenCV
Stacks1.4K
Followers1.1K
Votes101
OpenFace
OpenFace
Stacks31
Followers104
Votes3
GitHub Stars15.4K
Forks3.6K

OpenCV vs OpenFace: What are the differences?

Introduction

OpenCV and OpenFace are both popular computer vision libraries that are widely used for image processing and facial recognition tasks. While they may have some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Performance: OpenCV is known for its high-performance image processing capabilities. It provides a wide range of algorithms and functions that are optimized for speed and efficiency. On the other hand, OpenFace is primarily focused on facial recognition and analysis. It uses deep learning techniques and neural networks to achieve accurate and reliable results, but it may not be as fast as OpenCV when it comes to general image processing tasks.

  2. Facial Recognition Features: OpenCV provides some basic facial recognition features, such as face detection and face tracking. However, OpenFace goes a step further and offers advanced facial recognition capabilities, including face identification, landmark detection, and pose estimation. It can even recognize specific individuals in a database of known faces, which is not directly supported by OpenCV.

  3. Training and Model Development: OpenCV provides a comprehensive set of pre-trained models and algorithms that can be used out-of-the-box for various image processing tasks. It also offers tools for training custom models using machine learning techniques. On the other hand, OpenFace is specifically designed for deep learning-based facial recognition. It provides pre-trained models that have been trained on large datasets to achieve high accuracy. However, custom model training and development may require more effort and expertise compared to OpenCV.

  4. Application Focus: OpenCV is a general-purpose computer vision library that can be used for a wide range of applications, including image and video processing, object detection, and augmented reality. It is not solely focused on facial recognition. On the other hand, OpenFace is specifically designed for facial analysis and recognition tasks. It provides specialized features and algorithms that are tailored for this specific application domain.

  5. Library Size and Dependencies: OpenCV is a large library with many dependencies, as it provides a wide range of computer vision and image processing functions. It may require significant disk space and can be challenging to install and configure on some systems. On the other hand, OpenFace is a relatively smaller library with fewer dependencies. It is designed to be lightweight and easy to use, making it suitable for deployment in resource-constrained environments.

  6. Community and Support: OpenCV has a large and active community of developers and users. It has been around for many years and has a mature ecosystem, with extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums available for support. OpenFace, on the other hand, is a relatively newer library with a smaller community. While it still has an active developer community and provides documentation and examples, the level of support and available resources may not be as extensive as OpenCV.

In summary, OpenCV is a general-purpose computer vision library with a focus on performance and wide-ranging functionality, whereas OpenFace is a specialized library designed specifically for facial recognition and analysis tasks, providing advanced features and deep learning-based algorithms.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenCV
OpenCV
OpenFace
OpenFace

OpenCV was designed for computational efficiency and with a strong focus on real-time applications. Written in optimized C/C++, the library can take advantage of multi-core processing. Enabled with OpenCL, it can take advantage of the hardware acceleration of the underlying heterogeneous compute platform.

OpenFace is a Python and Torch implementation of face recognition with deep neural networks and is based on the CVPR 2015 paper FaceNet: A Unified Embedding for Face Recognition and Clustering by Florian Schroff, Dmitry Kalenichenko, and James Philbin at Google.

C++, C, Python and Java interfaces and supports Windows, Linux, Mac OS, iOS and Android;More than 47 thousand people of user community and estimated number of downloads exceeding 7 million;Usage ranges from interactive art, to mines inspection, stitching maps on the web or through advanced robotics
Detect faces with pre-trained models; Transform faces for the neural network; Use deep neural networks to reprsent or embed the face on a hypersphere; Apply favorite clustering or classification techniques to the features to complete recognition task
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.4K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.6K
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
31
Followers
1.1K
Followers
104
Votes
101
Votes
3
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 37
    Computer Vision
  • 18
    Open Source
  • 12
    Imaging
  • 10
    Face Detection
  • 10
    Machine Learning
Pros
  • 3
    Open Source

What are some alternatives to OpenCV, OpenFace?

Cloudinary

Cloudinary

Cloudinary is a cloud-based service that streamlines websites and mobile applications' entire image and video management needs - uploads, storage, administration, manipulations, and delivery.

imgix

imgix

imgix is the leading platform for end-to-end visual media processing. With robust APIs, SDKs, and integrations, imgix empowers developers to optimize, transform, manage, and deliver images and videos at scale through simple URL parameters.

ImageKit

ImageKit

ImageKit offers a real-time URL-based API for image & video optimization, streaming, and 50+ transformations to deliver perfect visual experiences on websites and apps. It also comes integrated with a Digital Asset Management solution.

Cloudimage

Cloudimage

Effortless image resizing, optimization and CDN delivery. Make your site fully responsive and really fast.

scikit-image

scikit-image

scikit-image is a collection of algorithms for image processing.

Kraken.io

Kraken.io

It supports JPEG, PNG and GIF files. You can optimize your images in two ways - by providing an URL of the image you want to optimize or by uploading an image file directly to its API.

ImageEngine

ImageEngine

ImageEngine is an intelligent Image CDN that dynamically optimizes image content tailored to the end users device. Using device intelligence at the CDN edge, developers can greatly simplify their image management process while accelerating their site.

FFMPEG

FFMPEG

The universal multimedia toolkit.

GStreamer

GStreamer

It is a library for constructing graphs of media-handling components. The applications it supports range from simple Ogg/Vorbis playback, audio/video streaming to complex audio (mixing) and video (non-linear editing) processing.

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick

GraphicsMagick is the swiss army knife of image processing. Comprised of 267K physical lines (according to David A. Wheeler's SLOCCount) of source code in the base package (or 1,225K including 3rd party libraries) it provides a robust and efficient collection of tools and libraries which support reading, writing, and manipulating an image in over 88 major formats including important formats like DPX, GIF, JPEG, JPEG-2000, PNG, PDF, PNM, and TIFF.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase