StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Companies
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Blog
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

API StatusChangelog
  1. Stackups
  2. Stackups
  3. OpenStack vs Proxmox VE

OpenStack vs Proxmox VE

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks792
Followers1.2K
Votes138
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE
Stacks350
Followers334
Votes41

OpenStack vs Proxmox VE: What are the differences?

OpenStack and Proxmox VE are open-source solutions for building and managing virtualized infrastructure. Let's explore the key differences between OpenStack and Proxmox VE in more detail:

  1. Architecture: OpenStack is a cloud computing platform that provides a complete set of infrastructure services, including compute, storage, and networking. It follows a modular architecture with various components, such as Nova for compute, Cinder for storage, Neutron for networking, and Keystone for identity and authentication. Proxmox VE, on the other hand, is a complete virtualization management solution that combines KVM-based virtualization, container-based virtualization (LXC), and software-defined storage. It offers a unified web-based interface for managing virtual machines, containers, and storage resources.

  2. Scalability: OpenStack is designed to scale horizontally and can handle large-scale deployments with thousands of physical servers and virtual machines. It provides features like auto-scaling, load balancing, and distributed storage to support high availability and scalability. Proxmox VE is also scalable but is more suitable for small to medium-sized deployments. It can handle hundreds of virtual machines and containers but may have limitations in terms of scaling to extremely large environments.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: OpenStack has a large and active community of contributors, including major technology companies, which ensures continuous development, updates, and support. It has a robust ecosystem with a wide range of plugins, extensions, and integrations with other cloud services and tools. Proxmox VE, although it has a smaller community compared to OpenStack, has an active user base and offers a supportive community forum. It also provides a set of built-in features and integrations, such as support for Ceph storage and ZFS file systems.

  4. Networking and Storage: OpenStack's Neutron component offers advanced networking options like virtual networks and SDN with Open vSwitch. It integrates with various storage backends. Proxmox VE supports bridged networking and VLANs but lacks the advanced networking capabilities of OpenStack. It includes its own software-defined storage solution using ZFS and Ceph.

  5. API and Automation: OpenStack provides a RESTful API for programmatically managing cloud infrastructure and integrates well with third-party tools. Proxmox VE also offers an API but is more focused on its specific functionality and may require additional scripting for advanced automation compared to OpenStack.

In summary, OpenStack and Proxmox VE are both powerful open-source solutions for virtualized infrastructure management. OpenStack is more suitable for large-scale cloud deployments with advanced networking requirements, while Proxmox VE provides a comprehensive and user-friendly virtualization management solution for smaller to medium-sized environments.

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
Proxmox VE
Proxmox VE

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
-
Statistics
Stacks
792
Stacks
350
Followers
1.2K
Followers
334
Votes
138
Votes
41
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
Pros
  • 9
    HA VM & LXC devices
  • 8
    Ease of use
  • 7
    Robust architecture
  • 6
    Free
  • 6
    Avoid vendor lock-in

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, Proxmox VE?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

VirtKick

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

OpenNebula

OpenNebula

It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana