StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Cloud Hosting
  4. Open Source Cloud
  5. OpenStack vs VMware vSphere

OpenStack vs VMware vSphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

OpenStack
OpenStack
Stacks790
Followers1.2K
Votes138
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Stacks608
Followers550
Votes30

OpenStack vs VMware vSphere: What are the differences?

OpenStack and VMware vSphere are both popular cloud computing platforms used by enterprises for managing their virtualized infrastructure. Let's explore the key differences between these two platforms.

  1. Architecture: OpenStack is an open-source platform that uses a modular architecture, allowing users to choose and integrate different components to build a customized cloud infrastructure. On the other hand, VMware vSphere is a proprietary platform that provides a comprehensive suite of integrated components for virtualization, networking, and storage.

  2. Cost: OpenStack is known for its cost-effectiveness as it is based on open-source technologies and can be deployed on commodity hardware. It allows organizations to leverage existing hardware investments and reduce their infrastructure costs. VMware vSphere, being a proprietary platform, requires licensing fees and is typically deployed on enterprise-grade hardware, which can be more expensive.

  3. Flexibility: OpenStack offers greater flexibility in terms of customization and integration. It allows users to combine different components and technologies to create a highly tailored cloud infrastructure that meets their specific requirements. VMware vSphere, on the other hand, provides a more standardized and integrated approach, which may be more suitable for organizations looking for a pre-packaged solution.

  4. Vendor Lock-in: OpenStack avoids vendor lock-in by providing an open and vendor-agnostic platform that can run on various hardware and software configurations. It allows organizations to switch between different vendors and technologies without major disruptions. VMware vSphere, being a proprietary platform, may lead to vendor lock-in as it requires organizations to adopt a specific set of technologies and tools.

  5. Community Support: OpenStack enjoys a large and active community of contributors and users who contribute to its development, provide support, and share best practices. This vibrant community ensures continuous improvements, regular updates, and access to a wide range of resources. VMware vSphere, although it has a strong user base, relies more on vendor support and may have a smaller community-driven ecosystem.

  6. Feature Set: OpenStack offers a wide range of features and capabilities that cater to the needs of various enterprise workloads. It provides support for virtualization, network, storage, and orchestration, among others. VMware vSphere, being a more mature platform, also offers a comprehensive set of features, including advanced virtualization, high availability, disaster recovery, and centralized management tools.

In summary, OpenStack provides a modular and cost-effective solution with greater flexibility and less vendor lock-in, while VMware vSphere offers a comprehensive and integrated platform with robust features and vendor support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

OpenStack
OpenStack
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere

OpenStack is a cloud operating system that controls large pools of compute, storage, and networking resources throughout a datacenter, all managed through a dashboard that gives administrators control while empowering their users to provision resources through a web interface.

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

Compute;Storage;Networking;Dashboard;Shared Services
Powerful Server Virtualization;Network Services;Efficient Storage;Consistent Automation;High Availability;Robust Security
Statistics
Stacks
790
Stacks
608
Followers
1.2K
Followers
550
Votes
138
Votes
30
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 60
    Private cloud
  • 39
    Avoid vendor lock-in
  • 23
    Flexible in use
  • 7
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Robust architecture
Pros
  • 8
    Strong host isolation
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Great VM management (HA,FT,...)
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Great Networking
Cons
  • 9
    Price

What are some alternatives to OpenStack, VMware vSphere?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Apache CloudStack

Apache CloudStack

CloudStack is open source software designed to deploy and manage large networks of virtual machines, as a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

VirtKick

VirtKick

Software as a service platform for hosting providers.

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

OpenNebula

OpenNebula

It provides a simple but feature-rich and flexible solution for the comprehensive management of virtualized data centers to enable on-premise enterprise clouds in existing infrastructures. It can be primarily used as a virtualization tool to manage your virtual infrastructure in the data-center or cluster, which is usually referred as Private Cloud. It supports Hybrid Cloud to combine local infrastructure with public cloud-based infrastructure, enabling highly scalable hosting environments.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana