OVH vs Red Hat OpenShift

Overview

Red Hat OpenShift

Stacks1.6K

Followers1.4K

Votes517

GitHub Stars885

Forks510

OVH

Stacks350

Followers292

Votes183

OVH vs Red Hat OpenShift: What are the differences?

Introduction: OVH and Red Hat OpenShift are two popular platforms used for different purposes. While OVH offers cloud computing services, OpenShift is a containerization platform. Here are the key differences between the two:

Pricing and Deployment Models: OVH provides a range of pricing models including pay-as-you-go, pre-packaged plans, and customizable options, while Red Hat OpenShift follows a subscription-based model with different tiers. In terms of deployment, OVH offers both public and private cloud options, whereas OpenShift focuses on private cloud deployments.
Infrastructure Management: OVH allows users to manage their infrastructure through a web interface, giving them control over virtual instances, storage, networking, and more. On the other hand, OpenShift's management is centered around Kubernetes, offering automated deployment, scaling, and monitoring of containers.
Container Orchestration: OVH primarily provides Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), allowing users to deploy and manage virtual machines directly. It also supports containerization technologies but does not offer built-in container orchestration capabilities. In contrast, OpenShift is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that leverages Kubernetes for container orchestration, providing features for scaling, load balancing, and self-healing of applications.
Application Development: OVH provides a variety of development tools, APIs, and SDKs to enable application development. However, it is more focused on infrastructure services rather than application-specific features. OpenShift, on the other hand, offers a developer-centric approach with built-in support for continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing developers to build, test, and deploy applications more efficiently.
Vendor Lock-in: OVH aims to provide open and interoperable solutions, allowing customers to easily switch between different cloud providers or deploy hybrid environments. Red Hat OpenShift, being a Red Hat product, is tightly integrated with other Red Hat technologies and may have some level of vendor lock-in, especially for customers heavily invested in the Red Hat ecosystem.
Support and Ecosystem: OVH offers technical support through multiple channels, including phone, email, and a community forum. However, its support offerings might not match the level of expertise provided by Red Hat's support services. OpenShift benefits from an extensive ecosystem of partners and a strong community, which contributes to its overall support, knowledge sharing, and integration with other tools and services.

In summary, OVH focuses on cloud computing services with flexible pricing models and infrastructure management options, while Red Hat OpenShift is a containerization platform built on Kubernetes, providing container orchestration, developer-centric features, and being tightly integrated with the Red Hat ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Red Hat OpenShift	OVH
OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.	OVHcloud is a global cloud provider that specialises in delivering industry-leading performance and cost-effective solutions to better manage, secure, and scale data. The group manages 30 data centres across 12 sites in 4 continents, man
Built-in support for Node.js, Ruby, Python, PHP, Perl, and Java (the standard in today's Enterprise);OpenShift is extensible with a customizable cartridge functionality that allows developers to add any other language they wish. We've seen everything from Clojure to Cobol running on OpenShift;OpenShift supports frameworks ranging from Spring, to Rails, to Play;Autoscaling- OpenShift can scale your application by adding additional instances of your application and enabling clustering. Alternatively, you can manually scale the amount of resources with which your application is deployed when needed;OpenShift by Red Hat is built on open-source technologies (Red Hat Enterprise Linux- RHEL);One Click Deployment- Deploying to the OpenShift platform is as easy a clicking a button or entering a "Git push" command	Delivery of servers in less than an hour 24/7/365;Full user control;Guaranteed bandwidth;99,99 % availability;Leader in the use of SSD;Latest technology components;More than 85 operating systems and distributions
Statistics
GitHub Stars 885	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 510	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 1.6K	Stacks 350
Followers 1.4K	Followers 292
Votes 517	Votes 183
Pros & Cons
Pros 99 Good free plan 63 Open Source 47 Easy setup 43 Nodejs support 42 Well documented Cons 2 Decisions are made for you, limiting your options 2 License cost 1 Behind, sometimes severely, the upstreams	Pros 57 Cost effective 34 Dedicated Hardware 29 DDoS Protection 27 Unmetered Bandwidth 9 Fun Cons 2 Incidents

What are some alternatives to Red Hat OpenShift, OVH?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Hasura

An open source GraphQL engine that deploys instant, realtime GraphQL APIs on any Postgres database.

Cloud 66

Cloud 66 gives you everything you need to build, deploy and maintain your applications on any cloud, without the headache of dealing with "server stuff". Frameworks: Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Jamstack, Laravel, GoLang, and more.

Jelastic

Jelastic is a Multi-Cloud DevOps PaaS for ISVs, telcos, service providers and enterprises needing to speed up development, reduce cost of IT infrastructure, improve uptime and security.

Dokku

It is an extensible, open source Platform as a Service that runs on a single server of your choice. It helps you build and manage the lifecycle of applications from building to scaling.

PythonAnywhere

It's somewhat unique. A small PaaS that supports web apps (Python only) as well as scheduled jobs with shell access. It is an expensive way to tinker and run several small apps.

Related Comparisons

OVH vs Red Hat OpenShift: What are the differences?

Pricing and Deployment Models: OVH provides a range of pricing models including pay-as-you-go, pre-packaged plans, and customizable options, while Red Hat OpenShift follows a subscription-based model with different tiers. In terms of deployment, OVH offers both public and private cloud options, whereas OpenShift focuses on private cloud deployments.
Infrastructure Management: OVH allows users to manage their infrastructure through a web interface, giving them control over virtual instances, storage, networking, and more. On the other hand, OpenShift's management is centered around Kubernetes, offering automated deployment, scaling, and monitoring of containers.
Container Orchestration: OVH primarily provides Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS), allowing users to deploy and manage virtual machines directly. It also supports containerization technologies but does not offer built-in container orchestration capabilities. In contrast, OpenShift is a Platform as a Service (PaaS) that leverages Kubernetes for container orchestration, providing features for scaling, load balancing, and self-healing of applications.
Application Development: OVH provides a variety of development tools, APIs, and SDKs to enable application development. However, it is more focused on infrastructure services rather than application-specific features. OpenShift, on the other hand, offers a developer-centric approach with built-in support for continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing developers to build, test, and deploy applications more efficiently.
Vendor Lock-in: OVH aims to provide open and interoperable solutions, allowing customers to easily switch between different cloud providers or deploy hybrid environments. Red Hat OpenShift, being a Red Hat product, is tightly integrated with other Red Hat technologies and may have some level of vendor lock-in, especially for customers heavily invested in the Red Hat ecosystem.
Support and Ecosystem: OVH offers technical support through multiple channels, including phone, email, and a community forum. However, its support offerings might not match the level of expertise provided by Red Hat's support services. OpenShift benefits from an extensive ecosystem of partners and a strong community, which contributes to its overall support, knowledge sharing, and integration with other tools and services.

OVH vs Red Hat OpenShift

Overview