Passport vs sso

Overview

Passport

Stacks471

Followers368

Votes0

GitHub Stars23.5K

Forks1.2K

sso

Stacks38

Followers89

Votes0

GitHub Stars3.1K

Forks191

Passport vs sso: What are the differences?

Passport and SSO are two different authentication systems used in website development. They have some key differences that set them apart from each other.

Implementation: Passport is a middleware authentication library for Node.js, while SSO (Single Sign-On) is a system that allows users to authenticate multiple applications with a single set of credentials. The main difference is that Passport is a specific library, while SSO can be implemented using various technologies or protocols such as OAuth or SAML.
Use Case: Passport is typically used for authentication within a single application or website, where users log in using their credentials specific to that application. On the other hand, SSO is used when multiple applications or websites need to share user authentication. With SSO, users only need to authenticate once and can then access multiple applications without providing their credentials again.
User Experience: Passport provides a seamless login experience within a single application. Users enter their credentials and are authenticated within that specific application. SSO, on the other hand, provides a convenient user experience by allowing users to log in once and access multiple applications without having to re-enter their credentials. This reduces the need for users to remember multiple sets of credentials.
Security Model: Passport focuses on implementing various authentication strategies within a single application, providing flexibility for developers to choose the desired level of security. SSO, on the other hand, focuses on centralizing authentication across multiple applications, ensuring a consistent and secure authentication process throughout the system. SSO often includes additional security measures such as single sign-off and session management.
Integration Complexity: Implementing Passport requires developers to integrate the library into their application, making it more suitable for single-application scenarios. On the other hand, implementing SSO involves integrating with additional systems and technologies, such as identity providers and token-based authentication protocols. This can add complexity to the development process, especially when dealing with multiple applications.
Scalability: Passport is designed to work within the context of a single application, making it relatively easy to scale horizontally by adding more instances of the application. SSO, on the other hand, is designed to handle authentication for multiple applications, making it more suitable for scaling vertically by adding more resources to handle increasing authentication requests across multiple applications.

In summary, Passport is a middleware authentication library for single applications, providing flexibility and ease of implementation, while SSO is a system that allows users to authenticate across multiple applications using a single set of credentials, providing convenience and centralized authentication.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Passport, sso

Vaibhav

Jul 17, 2020

Needs advice

Currently, Passport.js repo has 324 open issues, and Jared (the original author) seems to be the one doing most of the work. Also, given that the documentation is not proper. Is it worth using Passport.js?

As of now, StackShare shows it has 29 companies using it. How do you implement auth in your project or your company? Are there any good alternatives to Passport.js? Should I implement auth from scratch?

220k views220k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Passport	sso
It is authentication middleware for Node.js. Extremely flexible and modular, It can be unobtrusively dropped in to any Express-based web application. A comprehensive set of strategies support authentication using a username and password, Facebook, Twitter, and more.	The authentication and authorization system BuzzFeed developed to provide a secure, single sign-on experience for access to the many internal web apps used by our employees.
Single sign-on with OpenID and OAuth; Easily handle success and failure	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 23.5K	GitHub Stars 3.1K
GitHub Forks 1.2K	GitHub Forks 191
Stacks 471	Stacks 38
Followers 368	Followers 89
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
ExpressJS Vue.js JSON Web Token	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Passport, sso?

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Passport vs sso: What are the differences?

Passport and SSO are two different authentication systems used in website development. They have some key differences that set them apart from each other.

Implementation: Passport is a middleware authentication library for Node.js, while SSO (Single Sign-On) is a system that allows users to authenticate multiple applications with a single set of credentials. The main difference is that Passport is a specific library, while SSO can be implemented using various technologies or protocols such as OAuth or SAML.
Use Case: Passport is typically used for authentication within a single application or website, where users log in using their credentials specific to that application. On the other hand, SSO is used when multiple applications or websites need to share user authentication. With SSO, users only need to authenticate once and can then access multiple applications without providing their credentials again.
User Experience: Passport provides a seamless login experience within a single application. Users enter their credentials and are authenticated within that specific application. SSO, on the other hand, provides a convenient user experience by allowing users to log in once and access multiple applications without having to re-enter their credentials. This reduces the need for users to remember multiple sets of credentials.
Security Model: Passport focuses on implementing various authentication strategies within a single application, providing flexibility for developers to choose the desired level of security. SSO, on the other hand, focuses on centralizing authentication across multiple applications, ensuring a consistent and secure authentication process throughout the system. SSO often includes additional security measures such as single sign-off and session management.
Integration Complexity: Implementing Passport requires developers to integrate the library into their application, making it more suitable for single-application scenarios. On the other hand, implementing SSO involves integrating with additional systems and technologies, such as identity providers and token-based authentication protocols. This can add complexity to the development process, especially when dealing with multiple applications.
Scalability: Passport is designed to work within the context of a single application, making it relatively easy to scale horizontally by adding more instances of the application. SSO, on the other hand, is designed to handle authentication for multiple applications, making it more suitable for scaling vertically by adding more resources to handle increasing authentication requests across multiple applications.

Passport vs sso

Overview