StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Phalcon vs Twig

Phalcon vs Twig

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Phalcon
Phalcon
Stacks246
Followers294
Votes354
GitHub Stars10.8K
Forks2.0K
Twig
Twig
Stacks381
Followers157
Votes8

Phalcon vs Twig: What are the differences?

<Write Introduction here>
  1. Execution Speed: Phalcon is a PHP framework written in C and is known for its exceptional execution speed compared to Twig, which is a PHP template engine. This difference in speed is due to Phalcon's lower-level implementation in C, offering faster processing and response times for web applications.

  2. Dependency: Phalcon requires installing the PHP extension, whereas Twig can be used directly by including it via Composer. This means that for using Phalcon, additional setup and configuration are needed due to its reliance on a separate extension, while Twig can be integrated more easily into a project through Composer.

  3. Template Syntax: Phalcon uses its custom syntax for template files, while Twig follows a clear and concise syntax that resembles the natural language. This difference makes Twig more beginner-friendly for developers who are not familiar with the custom syntax of Phalcon.

  4. Extensibility: Phalcon provides a wide range of built-in functionalities and features out of the box, reducing the need for external libraries or plugins. On the other hand, Twig offers a modular approach with extensions and filters that can be easily integrated based on project requirements, providing developers with more flexibility in customizing their templates.

  5. Environment Set-up: Setting up a development environment for Phalcon might require extra steps due to its PHP extension dependency and compilation process. In contrast, Twig can be quickly integrated into existing PHP projects without the need for complex installation procedures, making it more accessible for developers looking for a hassle-free setup.

  6. Community Support: Phalcon has a smaller community compared to Twig, which is a widely used PHP template engine with extensive documentation, tutorials, and community support. This difference can impact the availability of resources and help for developers using Phalcon or Twig in their projects.

In Summary, Phalcon stands out for its exceptional speed and built-in features, requiring additional setup steps and having a custom template syntax, while Twig offers a more beginner-friendly environment with easier integration, clear syntax, and extensive community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phalcon
Phalcon
Twig
Twig

Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.

It is a modern template engine for PHP. It is flexible, fast, and secure. Its syntax originates from Jinja and Django templates.

-
Concise; Template oriented syntax; Full featured; Easy to learn; Extensibility; Unit tested; Documented
Statistics
GitHub Stars
10.8K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
246
Stacks
381
Followers
294
Followers
157
Votes
354
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 65
    Fast
  • 54
    High performance
  • 37
    Open source
  • 35
    Fast and easy to use
  • 32
    Scalable
Cons
  • 4
    Support few databases
  • 2
    Very bad documentation
Pros
  • 2
    For both nodejs and php
  • 2
    Native html, xml, txt etc
  • 2
    Gulp
  • 2
    Front to back with no efforts
Integrations
PHP
PHP
PHP
PHP

What are some alternatives to Phalcon, Twig?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase