Phalcon vs Yew Framework

Overview

Phalcon

Stacks246

Followers294

Votes354

GitHub Stars10.8K

Forks2.0K

Yew Framework

Stacks24

Followers51

Votes0

Phalcon vs Yew Framework: What are the differences?

Language: Phalcon is based on PHP, a widely used scripting language for web development, while Yew is based on Rust, a system programming language known for its performance and memory safety.
Performance: Phalcon is known for its high performance due to being a C-extension based PHP framework, offering low overhead and efficient memory usage. On the other hand, Yew, being based on Rust, is also highly performant and offers additional benefits such as thread safety and predictable performance.
Community and Ecosystem: Phalcon has a well-established community and ecosystem due to its longevity in the PHP world, with a wide range of extensions and libraries available for developers. Yew, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, but is growing rapidly with the support of Rust developers.
Learning Curve: Phalcon follows a more traditional MVC architecture, making it relatively easier for developers familiar with PHP frameworks to adapt to. Yew, on the other hand, follows a component-based architecture similar to modern frontend frameworks like React, which may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to Rust and component-based frameworks.
Hosting and Deployment: Phalcon, being based on PHP, can be easily deployed on most hosting platforms that support PHP applications. In contrast, Yew applications need to be compiled into WebAssembly before deployment, requiring hosting platforms that support serving WebAssembly files.
Tooling and Development Environment: Phalcon provides a range of tools and utilities specific to PHP development, while Yew benefits from the robust tooling and eco-system of Rust, including Cargo package manager and other development tools specific to Rust programming.

In Summary, Phalcon and Yew Framework differ in terms of language, performance, community, learning curve, hosting options, and development tooling and environment.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Phalcon	Yew Framework
Phalcon is a web framework implemented as a C extension offering high performance and lower resource consumption.	A modern Rust framework inspired by Elm and ReactJS. This framework is designed to be compiled into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten.
-	Compile into modern browsers' runtimes: wasm, asm.js, emscripten; Uses own virtual-dom representation; Put pure Rust code into HTML tags; Use single-line or multi-line Rust comments inside html-templates
Statistics
GitHub Stars 10.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 2.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 246	Stacks 24
Followers 294	Followers 51
Votes 354	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 65 Fast 54 High performance 37 Open source 35 Fast and easy to use 32 Scalable Cons 4 Support few databases 2 Very bad documentation	No community feedback yet
Integrations
PHP	WebAssembly Rust

What are some alternatives to Phalcon, Yew Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Phalcon vs Yew Framework: What are the differences?

Language: Phalcon is based on PHP, a widely used scripting language for web development, while Yew is based on Rust, a system programming language known for its performance and memory safety.
Performance: Phalcon is known for its high performance due to being a C-extension based PHP framework, offering low overhead and efficient memory usage. On the other hand, Yew, being based on Rust, is also highly performant and offers additional benefits such as thread safety and predictable performance.
Community and Ecosystem: Phalcon has a well-established community and ecosystem due to its longevity in the PHP world, with a wide range of extensions and libraries available for developers. Yew, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem in comparison, but is growing rapidly with the support of Rust developers.
Learning Curve: Phalcon follows a more traditional MVC architecture, making it relatively easier for developers familiar with PHP frameworks to adapt to. Yew, on the other hand, follows a component-based architecture similar to modern frontend frameworks like React, which may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to Rust and component-based frameworks.
Hosting and Deployment: Phalcon, being based on PHP, can be easily deployed on most hosting platforms that support PHP applications. In contrast, Yew applications need to be compiled into WebAssembly before deployment, requiring hosting platforms that support serving WebAssembly files.
Tooling and Development Environment: Phalcon provides a range of tools and utilities specific to PHP development, while Yew benefits from the robust tooling and eco-system of Rust, including Cargo package manager and other development tools specific to Rust programming.

In Summary, Phalcon and Yew Framework differ in terms of language, performance, community, learning curve, hosting options, and development tooling and environment.

Phalcon vs Yew Framework

Overview