Pharo vs Smalltalk

Overview

Pharo

Stacks39

Followers47

Votes44

Smalltalk

Stacks554

Followers42

Votes0

Pharo vs Smalltalk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Pharo and Smalltalk

Development Environment: Pharo provides a more modern and streamlined development environment compared to Smalltalk, with features like an integrated debugger and code completion tools. Smalltalk, on the other hand, might require additional tools and setups for efficient development.
Community Support: Pharo has a more active and vibrant community compared to Smalltalk, with regular updates, tutorials, and support forums available. Smalltalk, being an older language, may have a smaller community with limited resources for assistance and collaboration.
Package Management: Pharo has a built-in package management system that makes it easier to manage dependencies and external libraries for a project. Smalltalk might rely on third-party tools or manual setups for package management, which can be more cumbersome and time-consuming.
Modern Language Features: Pharo incorporates modern language features and improvements that might not be available in traditional Smalltalk implementations. These features include better support for concurrency, improved syntax, and enhanced performance optimizations.
Tooling Integration: Pharo has better integration with modern development tools and practices, such as version control systems like Git and continuous integration pipelines. Smalltalk, due to its legacy nature, might require more effort to integrate with these tools and workflows.
Cross-platform Compatibility: Pharo is actively maintained and updated to ensure cross-platform compatibility, supporting a wide range of operating systems and environments. Smalltalk implementations may not always provide the same level of compatibility and require additional configurations for different platforms.

In Summary, Pharo offers a more modern and feature-rich development experience compared to Smalltalk, with better community support, package management, and tooling integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pharo	Smalltalk
A pure object-oriented programming language and a powerful environment, focused on simplicity and immediate feedback.	It is an object-oriented, dynamically typed reflective programming language. It was created as the language underpinning the "new world" of computing exemplified by "human–computer symbiosis". It was designed and created in part for educational use, specifically for constructionist learning.
Object-oriented programming language; Live, immersive environment; Powerful debugger; Active Community	Object-oriented; Dynamically typed; Reflective programming language
Statistics
Stacks 39	Stacks 554
Followers 47	Followers 42
Votes 44	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Readable code 3 Dinamic live programming 3 Great syntax for anonymous functions (blocks) 3 Minimalist syntax 3 Programming in the debugger	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Linux macOS Windows

What are some alternatives to Pharo, Smalltalk?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

PhpStorm

PhpStorm is a PHP IDE which keeps up with latest PHP & web languages trends, integrates a variety of modern tools, and brings even more extensibility with support for major PHP frameworks.

IntelliJ IDEA

Out of the box, IntelliJ IDEA provides a comprehensive feature set including tools and integrations with the most important modern technologies and frameworks for enterprise and web development with Java, Scala, Groovy and other languages.

Related Comparisons

Pharo vs Smalltalk: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Pharo and Smalltalk

Development Environment: Pharo provides a more modern and streamlined development environment compared to Smalltalk, with features like an integrated debugger and code completion tools. Smalltalk, on the other hand, might require additional tools and setups for efficient development.
Community Support: Pharo has a more active and vibrant community compared to Smalltalk, with regular updates, tutorials, and support forums available. Smalltalk, being an older language, may have a smaller community with limited resources for assistance and collaboration.
Package Management: Pharo has a built-in package management system that makes it easier to manage dependencies and external libraries for a project. Smalltalk might rely on third-party tools or manual setups for package management, which can be more cumbersome and time-consuming.
Modern Language Features: Pharo incorporates modern language features and improvements that might not be available in traditional Smalltalk implementations. These features include better support for concurrency, improved syntax, and enhanced performance optimizations.
Tooling Integration: Pharo has better integration with modern development tools and practices, such as version control systems like Git and continuous integration pipelines. Smalltalk, due to its legacy nature, might require more effort to integrate with these tools and workflows.
Cross-platform Compatibility: Pharo is actively maintained and updated to ensure cross-platform compatibility, supporting a wide range of operating systems and environments. Smalltalk implementations may not always provide the same level of compatibility and require additional configurations for different platforms.

In Summary, Pharo offers a more modern and feature-rich development experience compared to Smalltalk, with better community support, package management, and tooling integration.

Pharo vs Smalltalk

Overview