StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Phoenix Framework vs Spring-Boot

Phoenix Framework vs Spring-Boot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Stacks26.7K
Followers24.3K
Votes1.0K
GitHub Stars78.9K
Forks41.6K
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.0K
Votes678
GitHub Stars22.6K
Forks3.0K

Phoenix Framework vs Spring-Boot: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Phoenix Framework and Spring-Boot

Phoenix is a web development framework written in Elixir programming language, while Spring-Boot is a web development framework written in Java programming language. Here are some key differences between Phoenix and Spring-Boot:

  1. Concurrency model: Phoenix uses the Erlang Virtual Machine (BEAM) which has built-in support for lightweight processes and message passing, allowing for highly concurrent and fault-tolerant applications. Spring-Boot, on the other hand, relies on the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) threading model for concurrency, which may not be as efficient for handling large numbers of concurrent requests.

  2. Language choice: Phoenix is built using Elixir, a functional programming language that runs on the Erlang VM, while Spring-Boot is built using Java, an object-oriented programming language. Elixir provides a more concise and expressive syntax for creating web applications, while Java has a larger ecosystem and is widely used in enterprise development.

  3. Scalability: Phoenix has built-in support for distributed computing and is designed to handle high loads and scale horizontally across multiple nodes. It leverages the fault-tolerant and distributed capabilities of the BEAM VM. Spring-Boot can also scale horizontally, but it requires additional configuration and setup to achieve the same level of fault tolerance and distribution.

  4. Development speed: Phoenix promotes rapid development through its use of code generators and conventions. It provides a clear and consistent structure for building web applications, making it easier to onboard new developers and maintain codebases. Spring-Boot, while also providing various productivity tools, may require more configuration and setup, especially for larger enterprise projects.

  5. Community and ecosystem: Spring-Boot has a large and active community of developers and a mature ecosystem of libraries, frameworks, and tools. This means that finding documentation, support, and third-party integrations for Spring-Boot is generally easier compared to Phoenix, which has a smaller community and ecosystem.

  6. Learning curve: Phoenix, being built on Elixir and following functional programming principles, has a steeper learning curve compared to Spring-Boot, which is built on Java and follows object-oriented programming principles. Developers familiar with Java and related technologies may find it easier to start with Spring-Boot, while developers with functional programming experience may prefer Phoenix.

In summary, Phoenix and Spring-Boot differ in their choice of programming language, concurrency models, scalability capabilities, development speed, community support, and learning curve. Which framework to choose depends on the specific needs and preferences of the project and development team.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Boot, Phoenix Framework

Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
Slimane
Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNestJSNestJSNode.jsNode.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k
Comments
Anonymous
Anonymous

Sep 15, 2020

Needs adviceonKotlinKotlinC#C#DjangoDjango

Hi

I’ve been using Django for the last year on and off to do my backend API. I’m getting a bit frustrated with the Django REST framework with the setup of the serializers and Django for the lack of web sockets. I’m considering either Spring or .NET Core. I’m familiar with Kotlin and C# but I’ve not built any substantial projects with them. I like OOP, building a desktop app, web API, and also the potential to get a job in the future or building a tool at work to manage my documents, dashboard and processes point cloud data.

I’m familiar with c/cpp, TypeScript.

I would love your insights on where I should go.

617k views617k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Phoenix Framework
Phoenix Framework

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
78.9K
GitHub Stars
22.6K
GitHub Forks
41.6K
GitHub Forks
3.0K
Stacks
26.7K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
24.3K
Followers
1.0K
Votes
1.0K
Votes
678
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 149
    Powerful and handy
  • 134
    Easy setup
  • 128
    Java
  • 90
    Spring
  • 85
    Fast
Cons
  • 23
    Heavy weight
  • 18
    Annotation ceremony
  • 13
    Java
  • 11
    Many config files needed
  • 5
    Reactive
Pros
  • 120
    High performance
  • 76
    Super fast
  • 70
    Rapid development
  • 62
    Open source
  • 60
    Erlang VM
Cons
  • 6
    No jobs
  • 5
    Very difficult
Integrations
Spring
Spring
Java
Java
Elixir
Elixir

What are some alternatives to Spring Boot, Phoenix Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

MEAN

MEAN

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase