StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. PhpSpec vs SpecFlow

PhpSpec vs SpecFlow

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PhpSpec
PhpSpec
Stacks540
Followers25
Votes3
SpecFlow
SpecFlow
Stacks153
Followers105
Votes0

PhpSpec vs SpecFlow: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In software testing, there are different tools available to support behavior-driven development. Two popular tools are PhpSpec and SpecFlow. Although both tools serve the same purpose, there are some key differences between them. In this document, we will highlight six main differences between PhpSpec and SpecFlow.

  1. Language Support: PhpSpec is primarily used for testing PHP code, while SpecFlow is mainly used for testing .NET applications. PhpSpec follows the BDD methodology specifically for PHP developers, while SpecFlow is designed for .NET developers using C# or VB.NET.

  2. Syntax: PhpSpec uses a descriptive syntax that is more focused on the behavior of the code being tested. It provides clear and readable test specifications using methods such as it, should, and expect. On the other hand, SpecFlow uses a natural language syntax that allows non-technical stakeholders to understand the test scenarios easily.

  3. Tool Integration: PhpSpec integrates well with popular PHP frameworks such as Symfony and Laravel. It also has seamless integration with PHPUnit, a widely used PHP testing framework. SpecFlow, on the other hand, integrates well with Microsoft Visual Studio and other .NET development tools, making it easier to incorporate testing into the development workflow.

  4. Automation: PhpSpec focuses on unit testing, providing a way to write executable specifications by creating test cases directly from the code. It encourages developers to focus on one behavior at a time and write tests to verify that behavior. SpecFlow, on the other hand, focuses on acceptance testing, allowing for the creation of automated acceptance tests that can be written in natural language and executed against the application.

  5. Documentation: PhpSpec puts a strong emphasis on self-documenting tests. The test specifications are written in a descriptive manner, making it easier for developers to understand the intended behavior of the code. SpecFlow also provides good documentation capabilities, allowing stakeholders to easily comprehend the acceptance criteria and test requirements.

  6. Community Support: PhpSpec has a vibrant community of PHP developers who actively contribute to its development. There are numerous resources, blog posts, and tutorials available to help developers get started and troubleshoot any issues. SpecFlow also has a strong community of .NET developers who contribute to its growth, providing support and sharing best practices.

In summary, PhpSpec and SpecFlow differ in terms of language support, syntax, tool integration, automation, documentation, and community support. These differences make them suitable for different environments and target audiences, allowing developers to choose the one that best fits their specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

PhpSpec
PhpSpec
SpecFlow
SpecFlow

It is a tool which can help you write clean and working PHP code using behaviour driven development or BDD. BDD is a technique derived from test-first development.

It is used to define, manage and automatically execute human-readable acceptance tests in .NET projects. Writing easily understandable tests is a cornerstone of the BDD paradigm and also helps build up a living documentation of your system.

Specification-oriented BDD framework; write clean and working PHP code
-
Statistics
Stacks
540
Stacks
153
Followers
25
Followers
105
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Mocked dependant services by default
  • 1
    Better for code optimisation (BDD over TDD)
  • 1
    BDD Unit Testing
Cons
  • 1
    Less support; devs are more used to PHP Unit
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Laravel
Laravel
PHP
PHP
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PhpSpec, SpecFlow?

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

TestCafe

TestCafe

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Selenide

Selenide

It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.

Capybara

Capybara

Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.

PHPUnit

PHPUnit

PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.

Detox

Detox

High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.

Imagium

Imagium

Imagium provides AI based visual testing solution for various forms of testing. It makes the job easier for QA Automation, Mobile Testers, DevOps and Compliance teams. Imagium is easy to integrate with any programing language

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana