Pijul vs Plastic SCM

Overview

Plastic SCM

Stacks40

Followers75

Votes17

Pijul

Stacks9

Followers22

Votes14

Pijul vs Plastic SCM: What are the differences?

Version Control System Type: Pijul is a distributed version control system (DVCS) that focuses on patch-based recording, allowing for non-linear history. On the other hand, Plastic SCM is also a DVCS, but it emphasizes a centralized version control model that offers branching and merging capabilities similar to other DVCS systems.
Conflict Resolution: Pijul uses a novel conflict resolution algorithm based on a sound theoretical foundation that guarantees correctness and ease of use. In contrast, Plastic SCM utilizes a merge system that relies on the user to manually resolve conflicts, which can be more labor-intensive and error-prone in complex scenarios.
Scalability: Pijul is more suitable for small to medium-sized projects due to its focus on simplicity and streamlined design. Plastic SCM, on the other hand, is designed to handle large-scale and enterprise-level projects with features like task tracking, visualization tools, and extensive branching capabilities.
Support for Binary Files: Pijul is primarily geared towards managing text-based files efficiently and may not provide optimal performance when dealing with large binary files. Plastic SCM, however, offers robust support for handling binary files, making it more suitable for projects where binary content is prevalent.
User Interface: Pijul provides a minimalist command-line interface that may require a learning curve for users accustomed to graphical user interfaces. Plastic SCM, on the other hand, offers a feature-rich graphical user interface with visual tools for tracking changes, managing branches, and integrating with other development tools.
Licensing Model: Pijul is an open-source project released under the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL), allowing for community contributions and usage in both commercial and non-commercial projects. In contrast, Plastic SCM is a commercial software solution that requires a paid license for full access to its features and support services.

In Summary, Pijul and Plastic SCM differ in their version control system type, conflict resolution strategies, scalability, binary file support, user interface, and licensing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Plastic SCM	Pijul
Plastic SCM is a distributed version control designed for big projects. It excels on branching and merging, graphical user interfaces, and can also deal with large files and even file-locking (great for game devs). It includes "semantic" features like refactor detection to ease diffing complex refactors.	Pijul is a free and open source (AGPL 3) distributed version control system. Its distinctive feature is to be based on a sound theory of patches, which makes it easy to learn and use, and really distributed.
Distributed version control system;Branch Explorer;Semantic Version Control;Locking;Huge files;Big projects;GitSync;Super strong merging;Partial replica;ACL security;Database backends	-
Statistics
Stacks 40	Stacks 9
Followers 75	Followers 22
Votes 17	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Wanna do Branch per Task Dev? Plastic rocks it 4 No Size limite 2 File Locking 2 Simple, easy to use interfaces. Resilient and solid 1 Very fast Cons 1 Always uses automatic conflict resolution first 1 Doesn't have file staging 1 No dark theme 1 Can't place windows next to each other to save space 1 Keyboard shortcuts are lacking	Pros 6 A VCS based on Category Theory? Awesome 4 Patch-based VCS 2 I like birds 1 Unrelated patches are commutative 1 The exact patch dependencies are tracked Cons 1 Lack of hosting options
Integrations
Gluon TeamCity Jenkins Visual Studio Code Visual Studio	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Plastic SCM, Pijul?

Git

Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.

Mercurial

Mercurial is dedicated to speed and efficiency with a sane user interface. It is written in Python. Mercurial's implementation and data structures are designed to be fast. You can generate diffs between revisions, or jump back in time within seconds.

SVN (Subversion)

Subversion exists to be universally recognized and adopted as an open-source, centralized version control system characterized by its reliability as a safe haven for valuable data; the simplicity of its model and usage; and its ability to support the needs of a wide variety of users and projects, from individuals to large-scale enterprise operations.

DVC

It is an open-source Version Control System for data science and machine learning projects. It is designed to handle large files, data sets, machine learning models, and metrics as well as code.

Magit

It is an interface to the version control system Git, implemented as an Emacs package. It aspires to be a complete Git porcelain. While we cannot (yet) claim that it wraps and improves upon each and every Git command, it is complete enough to allow even experienced Git users to perform almost all of their daily version control tasks directly from within Emacs. While many fine Git clients exist, only deserve to be called porcelains.

Replicate

It lets you run machine learning models with a few lines of code, without needing to understand how machine learning works.

isomorphic-git

It is a pure JavaScript reimplementation of git that works in both Node.js and browser JavaScript environments. It can read and write to git repositories, fetch from and push to git remotes (such as GitHub), all without any native C++ module dependencies.

Git Reflow

Reflow automatically creates pull requests, ensures the code review is approved, and squash merges finished branches to master with a great commit message template.

Gitless

Gitless is an experiment to see what happens if you put a simple veneer on an app that changes the underlying concepts. Because Gitless is implemented on top of Git (could be considered what Git pros call a "porcelain" of Git), you can always fall back on Git.

BitKeeper

BitKeeper is a fast, enterprise-ready, distributed SCM that scales up to very large projects and down to tiny ones.

Related Comparisons

Pijul vs Plastic SCM: What are the differences?

Version Control System Type: Pijul is a distributed version control system (DVCS) that focuses on patch-based recording, allowing for non-linear history. On the other hand, Plastic SCM is also a DVCS, but it emphasizes a centralized version control model that offers branching and merging capabilities similar to other DVCS systems.
Conflict Resolution: Pijul uses a novel conflict resolution algorithm based on a sound theoretical foundation that guarantees correctness and ease of use. In contrast, Plastic SCM utilizes a merge system that relies on the user to manually resolve conflicts, which can be more labor-intensive and error-prone in complex scenarios.
Scalability: Pijul is more suitable for small to medium-sized projects due to its focus on simplicity and streamlined design. Plastic SCM, on the other hand, is designed to handle large-scale and enterprise-level projects with features like task tracking, visualization tools, and extensive branching capabilities.
Support for Binary Files: Pijul is primarily geared towards managing text-based files efficiently and may not provide optimal performance when dealing with large binary files. Plastic SCM, however, offers robust support for handling binary files, making it more suitable for projects where binary content is prevalent.
User Interface: Pijul provides a minimalist command-line interface that may require a learning curve for users accustomed to graphical user interfaces. Plastic SCM, on the other hand, offers a feature-rich graphical user interface with visual tools for tracking changes, managing branches, and integrating with other development tools.
Licensing Model: Pijul is an open-source project released under the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL), allowing for community contributions and usage in both commercial and non-commercial projects. In contrast, Plastic SCM is a commercial software solution that requires a paid license for full access to its features and support services.

In Summary, Pijul and Plastic SCM differ in their version control system type, conflict resolution strategies, scalability, binary file support, user interface, and licensing model.

Pijul vs Plastic SCM

Overview