Play vs Revel: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This markdown provides a comparison between Play and Revel web frameworks.

1. **Language Support**: Play primarily supports Java and Scala while Revel is designed for Go language development. 
2. **Architecture**: Play follows a more traditional MVC pattern, allowing developers to structure their applications with models, views, and controllers. In contrast, Revel incorporates a convention over configuration approach, providing a predefined structure for developers to follow.
3. **Performance**: Play is known for its scalability and high performance due to its asynchronous and non-blocking nature, making it suitable for real-time applications. Revel, on the other hand, provides a simpler and more straightforward structure, leading to faster development but potentially sacrificing some performance optimizations.
4. **Community and Support**: Play has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and resources available. Revel, being a newer framework, might have a smaller community and fewer resources to rely on for support.
5. **Learning Curve**: Play, with its more extensive feature set and flexibility, can have a steeper learning curve for beginners. Revel's simpler structure and conventions aim to reduce the learning curve and allow developers to get started more quickly.
6. **Tooling and Integration**: Play has strong integration with popular build tools like SBT and Maven, along with support for IDEs like IntelliJ and Eclipse. Revel provides tools like Revel command-line interface for project management but may lack the extensive tooling support available for Play.

In Summary, Play and Revel differ in terms of language support, architecture, performance, community, learning curve, and tooling and integration.