StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. Playwright vs WebdriverIO

Playwright vs WebdriverIO

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO
Stacks426
Followers509
Votes40
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks2.6K
Playwright
Playwright
Stacks614
Followers586
Votes81
GitHub Stars79.0K
Forks4.8K

Playwright vs WebdriverIO: What are the differences?

Playwright and WebdriverIO are both popular tools for automating web browsers, but they have some key differences. Here are the main differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: Playwright is built on top of a new web automation protocol called the "CDP" (Chrome DevTools Protocol). It supports multiple browsers (Chrome, Firefox, and WebKit) and provides a more efficient and consistent way to interact with web browsers. WebdriverIO, on the other hand, is built on top of the WebDriver protocol, which is more widely supported but can sometimes be less performant and have browser-specific limitations.

  2. Multi-Tab Support: Playwright has built-in support for handling multiple tabs or windows in a browser, making it easier to perform actions in different browser contexts. WebdriverIO also supports multi-tabs, but it requires additional setup and custom code to achieve the same functionality.

  3. Parallel Execution: Playwright supports parallel execution out of the box, allowing you to run tests concurrently and speed up the execution time. WebdriverIO also supports parallel execution, but it requires additional setup and configuration.

  4. Debugging: Playwright provides a powerful debugging experience with built-in support for recording and capturing screenshots or videos during test execution. It also offers the ability to pause and inspect the state of the browser at any point in your tests. WebdriverIO does not provide these debugging features out of the box, although it can be achieved with additional tools and workarounds.

  5. Automation Capabilities: Playwright offers advanced automation capabilities, such as the ability to interact with iframes, shadow DOM elements, and native file dialogs. WebdriverIO also supports these features but may require additional configuration or workarounds to achieve the same level of automation.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: WebdriverIO has a larger community and ecosystem compared to Playwright, which means there are more resources, plugins, and integrations available for WebdriverIO. However, Playwright has been rapidly gaining popularity and has a growing community and ecosystem as well.

In summary, Playwright offers a more modern and efficient approach to web automation with its new protocol and advanced features, while WebdriverIO provides a more widely supported solution with a larger community and ecosystem. The choice between the two depends on your specific requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on WebdriverIO, Playwright

Esther
Esther

Feb 16, 2020

Needs adviceonreact-testing-libraryreact-testing-library

Hi, I am starting out to test an application that is currently being developed - FE: React. BE: Node JS. I want the framework to be able to test all UI scenarios (from simple to complex) and also have the capability to test APIs. I also need to run tests across all OSs and Browsers (Windows, Mac, Android, iOS). I have also looked into react-testing-library and @TestProject.io. Any advice you can give as to which framework would be best and why would be so much appreciated! Thank you!!

96.5k views96.5k
Comments
Shivam
Shivam

Mar 5, 2020

Needs advice

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

241k views241k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

WebdriverIO
WebdriverIO
Playwright
Playwright

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Extendable; Support for the WebDriver specification as well as to Appium; Easy Test Setup; Run tests on desktop and mobile, Command line interface
Node library; Headless supported; Enables cross-browser web automation; Improved automated UI testing
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Stars
79.0K
GitHub Forks
2.6K
GitHub Forks
4.8K
Stacks
426
Stacks
614
Followers
509
Followers
586
Votes
40
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Various integrations to vendors like Sauce Labs
  • 10
    Open Source
  • 8
    Great community
  • 7
    Easy to setup
  • 4
    Best solution for broad browser support
Cons
  • 8
    High maintenance
Pros
  • 15
    Cross browser
  • 11
    Open source
  • 9
    Test Runner with Playwright/test
  • 7
    Well documented
  • 7
    Promise based
Cons
  • 12
    Less help
  • 3
    Node based
  • 2
    Does not execute outside of browser
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
Selenium
Selenium
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to WebdriverIO, Playwright?

BrowserStack

BrowserStack

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

LambdaTest

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

Puppeteer

Puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

PhantomJS

PhantomJS

PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana