Polymer vs sauron (framework): What are the differences?
## Introduction
Key differences between Polymer and Sauron frameworks are outlined below:
1. **Language Compatibility**: Polymer is written in JavaScript and utilizes ECMAScript 6 syntax, while Sauron is written in Rust, a systems programming language known for its safety and performance.
2. **Rendering Approach**: Polymer follows a Virtual DOM approach for rendering, where changes are batched and efficiently applied to the actual DOM. Sauron, on the other hand, uses a Virtual-DOM based system, similar to React, for optimizing rendering performance.
3. **Component Architecture**: Polymer uses web components as its core building blocks, making it easier to create reusable elements. Sauron focuses on functional programming paradigms and provides a composable and pure-functional approach to building components.
4. **State Management**: Polymer relies on libraries like Redux for managing application state, enabling centralized data flow. Sauron, however, has its built-in state management system that leverages Rust's ownership model for efficient state handling.
5. **Tooling and Ecosystem**: Polymer has a comprehensive set of tools like Polymer CLI for scaffolding projects and Polymer Analyzer for static analysis. Sauron, being a newer framework, is still developing its ecosystem but benefits from Rust's rich tooling and package management capabilities.
6. **Performance Optimization**: Polymer focuses on optimizing front-end performance through features like lazy-loading and server-side rendering support. Sauron takes advantage of Rust's performance optimizations to deliver fast and efficient web applications.
In Summary, the key differences between Polymer and Sauron frameworks lie in their language compatibility, rendering approach, component architecture, state management, tooling and ecosystem, and performance optimization strategies.
