PrimeFaces vs Web Components

Overview

PrimeFaces

Stacks111

Followers190

Votes4

Web Components

Stacks82

Followers60

Votes0

PrimeFaces vs Web Components: What are the differences?

Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 1: PrimeFaces is a JSF (JavaServer Faces) component library that offers a wide range of enterprise-ready UI components. These components are specific to JSF and provide enhanced functionality, styling, and interactivity. On the other hand, Web Components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create reusable custom HTML elements and encapsulate their functionality. Web Components are not tied to any specific web framework.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 2: PrimeFaces components are built using JSF lifecycle and follow the JSF programming model. They offer features such as server-side data processing, AJAX support, and easy integration with JSF forms. Web Components, on the other hand, are based on web standards and can be utilized in any web framework or even without one. They enable encapsulation and composition of custom elements, making it easier to reuse and maintain code.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 3: PrimeFaces components provide a rich set of pre-built UI components like input fields, buttons, tables, and charts, along with ready-to-use themes. These components are specifically designed for JSF development and come with JSF-specific features. In contrast, Web Components offer a low-level API for creating custom elements and do not provide pre-built UI components. Developers need to create their own custom elements using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build the desired UI.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 4: PrimeFaces has good integration with JSF lifecycle events and provides features like validation, conversion, and model binding out-of-the-box. It follows the traditional server-side rendering approach where the components are processed on the server and the resulting HTML is sent to the client. Web Components, on the other hand, are typically rendered on the client-side and can work with any server-side technology. They allow for more flexibility in client-server communication and can be easily combined with modern JavaScript frameworks.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 5: PrimeFaces provides a comprehensive set of advanced features like data filtering, sorting, lazy loading, pagination, and internationalization for its components. These features aim to simplify the development of complex enterprise applications. Web Components, on the other hand, offer a more lightweight and modular approach. They focus on providing a solid foundation for building reusable components, and developers can add advanced features as needed using other web technologies or frameworks.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 6: PrimeFaces has tight integration with JSF and leverages its features like managed beans, event handling, and navigation rules. It offers seamless interaction with other JSF components and respects the JSF lifecycle. Web Components, on the other hand, are framework-agnostic and provide a standard way to define and use custom elements across different web technologies. They can be easily used alongside other frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue without any issues.

In Summary, PrimeFaces is a JSF component library that provides a wide range of pre-built UI components, while Web Components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create reusable custom HTML elements in any web framework. PrimeFaces offers JSF-specific features, tight integration with JSF, and advanced functionality, while Web Components provide a more lightweight, flexible, and framework-agnostic approach to building custom elements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on PrimeFaces, Web Components

Gericke

Jul 27, 2020

Needs adviceon

.NET Core

JavaScript

React

Hi,

I am looking into solutions for reusable components for an existing #MVC project which is build on .NET Core. Currently some functionality is being reuses via JavaScript. I have React experience so I know I can create React components and then reference it on the MVC app. The only problem is I do not know the full extent of it as the current app uses a lot of 3rd party libraries, not sure how that will effect React components. I am currently looking into WebComponents which is also another way for creating reusable components and it is compatible with any JavaScript library based on what I have seen on the website. Also to take in consideration that it should cause a re-write of the system.

So my question is, to future-proof reusable components, which will be best React or Web Components? And which will be more reliable to use with 3rd party libraries?

49.1k views49.1k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

PrimeFaces	Web Components
It is a popular open source framework for JavaServer Faces featuring over 100 components, touch optimized mobilekit, client side validation, theme engine and more.	Web components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create new custom, reusable, encapsulated HTML tags to use in web pages and web apps.
Touch optimized; Client side validation	-
Statistics
Stacks 111	Stacks 82
Followers 190	Followers 60
Votes 4	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 JEE Integration 1 Support Contract available 1 Nice Components Cons 1 JSF 1 Some components have to be bought	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript Spring Boot	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to PrimeFaces, Web Components?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Related Comparisons

PrimeFaces vs Web Components: What are the differences?

Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 1: PrimeFaces is a JSF (JavaServer Faces) component library that offers a wide range of enterprise-ready UI components. These components are specific to JSF and provide enhanced functionality, styling, and interactivity. On the other hand, Web Components are a set of web platform APIs that allow you to create reusable custom HTML elements and encapsulate their functionality. Web Components are not tied to any specific web framework.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 2: PrimeFaces components are built using JSF lifecycle and follow the JSF programming model. They offer features such as server-side data processing, AJAX support, and easy integration with JSF forms. Web Components, on the other hand, are based on web standards and can be utilized in any web framework or even without one. They enable encapsulation and composition of custom elements, making it easier to reuse and maintain code.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 3: PrimeFaces components provide a rich set of pre-built UI components like input fields, buttons, tables, and charts, along with ready-to-use themes. These components are specifically designed for JSF development and come with JSF-specific features. In contrast, Web Components offer a low-level API for creating custom elements and do not provide pre-built UI components. Developers need to create their own custom elements using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build the desired UI.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 4: PrimeFaces has good integration with JSF lifecycle events and provides features like validation, conversion, and model binding out-of-the-box. It follows the traditional server-side rendering approach where the components are processed on the server and the resulting HTML is sent to the client. Web Components, on the other hand, are typically rendered on the client-side and can work with any server-side technology. They allow for more flexibility in client-server communication and can be easily combined with modern JavaScript frameworks.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 5: PrimeFaces provides a comprehensive set of advanced features like data filtering, sorting, lazy loading, pagination, and internationalization for its components. These features aim to simplify the development of complex enterprise applications. Web Components, on the other hand, offer a more lightweight and modular approach. They focus on providing a solid foundation for building reusable components, and developers can add advanced features as needed using other web technologies or frameworks.
Key difference between PrimeFaces and Web Components 6: PrimeFaces has tight integration with JSF and leverages its features like managed beans, event handling, and navigation rules. It offers seamless interaction with other JSF components and respects the JSF lifecycle. Web Components, on the other hand, are framework-agnostic and provide a standard way to define and use custom elements across different web technologies. They can be easily used alongside other frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue without any issues.

PrimeFaces vs Web Components

Overview