StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. Templating Languages And Extensions
  5. Pug vs TypeScript

Pug vs TypeScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Pug
Pug
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.2K
Votes467
TypeScript
TypeScript
Stacks105.1K
Followers74.2K
Votes503
GitHub Stars106.6K
Forks13.1K

Pug vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction

Below are the key differences between Pug and TypeScript:

  1. Syntax and Usage: Pug is a templating language that provides a more concise and expressive syntax for writing HTML, while TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing to the language. Pug focuses on improving the readability and maintainability of HTML code, whereas TypeScript is primarily used to enhance the development experience by catching type-related errors at compile-time.

  2. Purpose: Pug is primarily used for generating HTML markup, making it easier to write and manage complex HTML templates. In contrast, TypeScript is used for building large-scale JavaScript applications, providing static type checking, better tooling support, and improved code organization.

  3. Language Features: Pug introduces a new syntax and features like mixins, conditionals, loops, and includes to enhance the HTML templating experience. TypeScript, on the other hand, introduces features like static typing, interfaces, generics, decorators, and modules to improve the JavaScript development process.

  4. Tooling and Compilation: Pug templates are compiled into HTML on the server-side or during the build process, resulting in optimized and minimal HTML code. TypeScript, on the other hand, requires compilation to JavaScript before it can be executed in the browser or server-side environment. The TypeScript compiler checks for type errors during this compilation process.

  5. Ecosystem and Community: Pug has its own ecosystem, including plugins and integrations for various web development frameworks, while TypeScript integrates seamlessly with existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks. TypeScript has a larger community and is widely adopted in enterprise-level projects.

  6. Error Detection: Pug focuses on detecting and providing feedback on issues related to HTML and template syntax. It helps catch errors related to unclosed tags, mismatched attribute names, or other HTML-specific issues. On the other hand, TypeScript is more concerned with detecting type errors and providing feedback on incorrect variable assignments, function calls, and code organization.

In summary, Pug is a templating language that enhances the HTML writing experience, while TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing and improved tooling support to JavaScript development. Pug focuses on generating optimized HTML code, while TypeScript focuses on catching type-related errors at compile-time.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Pug, TypeScript

Peter
Peter

May 17, 2019

ReviewonTypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

  • incredible developer tooling and community support
  • actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
  • easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
  • refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

135k views135k
Comments
Jarvis
Jarvis

May 16, 2019

ReviewonTypeScriptTypeScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k
Comments
David
David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

ReviewonJavaScriptJavaScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)TypeScriptTypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Pug
Pug
TypeScript
TypeScript

This project was formerly known as "Jade." Pug is a high performance template engine heavily influenced by Haml and implemented with JavaScript for Node.js and browsers.

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
106.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
13.1K
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
105.1K
Followers
1.2K
Followers
74.2K
Votes
467
Votes
503
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 138
    Elegant html
  • 90
    Great with nodejs
  • 59
    Very short syntax
  • 59
    Open source
  • 54
    Structured with indentation
Pros
  • 173
    More intuitive and type safe javascript
  • 105
    Type safe
  • 80
    JavaScript superset
  • 48
    The best AltJS ever
  • 27
    Best AltJS for BackEnd
Cons
  • 5
    Code may look heavy and confusing
  • 4
    Hype
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Pug, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase