Pushpin vs Streamdata.io

Overview

Pushpin

Stacks10

Followers49

Votes3

Streamdata.io

Stacks1

Followers24

Votes2

Pushpin vs Streamdata.io: What are the differences?

Protocol Support: Pushpin primarily supports WebSocket protocol for real-time communication, while Streamdata.io supports Server-Sent Events (SSE), WebSocket, and HTTP. This difference gives Streamdata.io a wider range of options for integrating with different types of applications.
Caching Mechanism: Pushpin has a built-in caching mechanism that helps in storing and distributing the data efficiently. On the other hand, Streamdata.io does not provide a caching mechanism by default, which may require additional configurations for certain use cases that rely on caching.
Data Transformation: Pushpin offers more control over data transformation and customization through its flexible configuration options. In contrast, Streamdata.io simplifies data transformation by providing pre-built features and templates, making it easier for developers to implement.
Scalability: Pushpin is known for its scalability and high performance, suitable for handling a large volume of real-time data streams. Streamdata.io is also scalable but may have limitations in terms of handling extremely high traffic or complex real-time data scenarios.
Open-Source vs. SaaS: Pushpin is an open-source tool that allows users to modify and customize the code according to their requirements. In comparison, Streamdata.io is a SaaS platform that offers a managed solution with less flexibility in customization but provides ease of use and maintenance.
Event Handling: Pushpin provides more advanced event handling capabilities, including support for custom event triggers and callbacks, whereas Streamdata.io simplifies event handling with predefined mechanisms, suitable for rapid development and prototyping.

In Summary, Pushpin and Streamdata.io differ in protocol support, caching mechanism, data transformation options, scalability, deployment models, and event handling capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Pushpin	Streamdata.io
Pushpin is a reverse proxy server that makes it easy to build realtime web services. The project is unique among realtime push solutions in that it is designed to address the needs of API creators.	Streamdata.io is a real-time cache proxy allowing you to poll JSON REST APIs and push updates to clients. Streamdata.io also keeps a history of modifications that occur on the data between two pollings. This way, streamdata.io is able to give you the list of modifications which happened since last time you fetched the data.
Supports HTTP streaming, HTTP long-polling, and WebSockets.;Clients communicate using your API contract. Pushpin is a server-side implementation detail.;Since Pushpin is a proxy server, the backend can be written in any language.;Compatible with API management systems, such as Kong and 3scale.;Horizontally scalable. Instances don't talk to each other.;Open source. Commercial support available from Fanout.	-
Statistics
Stacks 10	Stacks 1
Followers 49	Followers 24
Votes 3	Votes 2
Pros & Cons
Pros 3 Open source Cons 1 Worst community support	Pros 1 Best way to stream a static API 1 The quickest way to turn any existing API into stream

What are some alternatives to Pushpin, Streamdata.io?

Firebase

Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.

Socket.IO

It enables real-time bidirectional event-based communication. It works on every platform, browser or device, focusing equally on reliability and speed.

PubNub

PubNub makes it easy for you to add real-time capabilities to your apps, without worrying about the infrastructure. Build apps that allow your users to engage in real-time across mobile, browser, desktop and server.

Pusher

Pusher is the category leader in delightful APIs for app developers building communication and collaboration features.

SignalR

SignalR allows bi-directional communication between server and client. Servers can now push content to connected clients instantly as it becomes available. SignalR supports Web Sockets, and falls back to other compatible techniques for older browsers. SignalR includes APIs for connection management (for instance, connect and disconnect events), grouping connections, and authorization.

Ably

Ably offers WebSockets, stream resume, history, presence, and managed third-party integrations to make it simple to build, extend, and deliver digital realtime experiences at scale.

Syncano

Syncano is a backend platform to build powerful real-time apps more efficiently. Integrate with any API, minimize boilerplate code and control your data - all from one place.

NATS

Unlike traditional enterprise messaging systems, NATS has an always-on dial tone that does whatever it takes to remain available. This forms a great base for building modern, reliable, and scalable cloud and distributed systems.

SocketCluster

SocketCluster is a fast, highly scalable HTTP + realtime server engine which lets you build multi-process realtime servers that make use of all CPU cores on a machine/instance. It removes the limitations of having to run your Node.js server as a single thread and makes your backend resilient by automatically recovering from worker crashes and aggregating errors into a central log.

deepstream.io

Scalable Server for Realtime Web Apps with JSON structures that can be read, manipulated and listened to, messages that can be sent to one or more subscribers, and request response workflows, between two clients or servers.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

Pushpin vs Streamdata.io: What are the differences?

Protocol Support: Pushpin primarily supports WebSocket protocol for real-time communication, while Streamdata.io supports Server-Sent Events (SSE), WebSocket, and HTTP. This difference gives Streamdata.io a wider range of options for integrating with different types of applications.
Caching Mechanism: Pushpin has a built-in caching mechanism that helps in storing and distributing the data efficiently. On the other hand, Streamdata.io does not provide a caching mechanism by default, which may require additional configurations for certain use cases that rely on caching.
Data Transformation: Pushpin offers more control over data transformation and customization through its flexible configuration options. In contrast, Streamdata.io simplifies data transformation by providing pre-built features and templates, making it easier for developers to implement.
Scalability: Pushpin is known for its scalability and high performance, suitable for handling a large volume of real-time data streams. Streamdata.io is also scalable but may have limitations in terms of handling extremely high traffic or complex real-time data scenarios.
Open-Source vs. SaaS: Pushpin is an open-source tool that allows users to modify and customize the code according to their requirements. In comparison, Streamdata.io is a SaaS platform that offers a managed solution with less flexibility in customization but provides ease of use and maintenance.
Event Handling: Pushpin provides more advanced event handling capabilities, including support for custom event triggers and callbacks, whereas Streamdata.io simplifies event handling with predefined mechanisms, suitable for rapid development and prototyping.

In Summary, Pushpin and Streamdata.io differ in protocol support, caching mechanism, data transformation options, scalability, deployment models, and event handling capabilities.