PySpark vs Scala

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

PySpark

258
287
+ 1
0
Scala

10.7K
7.6K
+ 1
1.5K
Add tool

PySpark vs Scala: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides key differences between PySpark and Scala for website use. PySpark is the Python API for Apache Spark, while Scala is a language that can be used with Spark. Below are the key differences:

  1. Language Compatibility: PySpark allows developers to write Spark applications using Python programming language, whereas Scala provides a native integration with Spark and is the primary language for writing Spark applications. This difference allows developers to choose the language they are most comfortable with for implementing Spark applications.

  2. Performance: Scala offers better performance compared to PySpark. Due to its static typing and direct integration with Spark, Scala can optimize Spark operations and achieve faster execution times. On the other hand, PySpark being dynamically typed, has a slight performance overhead due to type-checking at runtime.

  3. Ease of Use: PySpark is generally considered more user-friendly and easier to understand for beginners due to its Python syntax and wide range of libraries and packages available for data processing and analysis. Scala, while powerful, may have a steeper learning curve for developers who are not familiar with functional programming concepts.

  4. Development Speed: PySpark often provides faster development speed in terms of writing and debugging code. Python's concise syntax and interactive mode make it easier to experiment and prototype Spark applications. Scala, being a statically-typed language, may require more code and time to write and debug compared to PySpark.

  5. Integration with Python Ecosystem: PySpark has a strong integration with the Python ecosystem, allowing developers to leverage powerful libraries and frameworks like Pandas, NumPy, and Scikit-learn for data preprocessing, machine learning, and visualization. Scala, while having its own ecosystem, may not have the same level of maturity and variety of libraries available.

  6. Data Type Handling: PySpark provides built-in support for dynamic data types and automatic inference of schema from data sources, making it easier to work with semi-structured or unstructured data. Scala, being statically typed, requires explicit declaration and handling of data types, which can be more efficient but also more restrictive in certain scenarios.

In summary, PySpark is more user-friendly and offers better integration with the Python ecosystem, while Scala provides better performance and is the preferred choice for developers with experience in functional programming and a need for faster execution times.

Advice on PySpark and Scala
Needs advice
on
GolangGolangNode.jsNode.js
and
ScalaScala

Finding the best server-side tool for building a personal information organizer that focuses on performance, simplicity, and scalability.

performance and scalability get a prototype going fast by keeping codebase simple find hosting that is affordable and scales well (Java/Scala-based ones might not be affordable)

See more
Replies (1)
David Annez
VP Product at loveholidays · | 5 upvotes · 292.8K views
Recommends
on
Node.jsNode.js
at

I've picked Node.js here but honestly it's a toss up between that and Go around this. It really depends on your background and skillset around "get something going fast" for one of these languages. Based on not knowing that I've suggested Node because it can be easier to prototype quickly and built right is performant enough. The scaffolding provided around Node.js services (Koa, Restify, NestJS) means you can get up and running pretty easily. It's important to note that the tooling surrounding this is good also, such as tracing, metrics et al (important when you're building production ready services).

You'll get more scalability and perf from go, but balancing them out I would say that you'll get pretty far with a well built Node.JS service (our entire site with over 1.5k requests/m scales easily and holds it's own with 4 pods in production.

Without knowing the scale you are building for and the systems you are using around it it's hard to say for certain this is the right route.

See more
Decisions about PySpark and Scala

We needed to incorporate Big Data Framework for data stream analysis, specifically Apache Spark / Apache Storm. The three options of languages were most suitable for the job - Python, Java, Scala.

The winner was Python for the top of the class, high-performance data analysis libraries (NumPy, Pandas) written in C, quick learning curve, quick prototyping allowance, and a great connection with other future tools for machine learning as Tensorflow.

The whole code was shorter & more readable which made it easier to develop and maintain.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of PySpark
Pros of Scala
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 187
      Static typing
    • 178
      Pattern-matching
    • 177
      Jvm
    • 172
      Scala is fun
    • 138
      Types
    • 95
      Concurrency
    • 88
      Actor library
    • 86
      Solve functional problems
    • 81
      Open source
    • 80
      Solve concurrency in a safer way
    • 44
      Functional
    • 24
      Fast
    • 23
      Generics
    • 18
      It makes me a better engineer
    • 17
      Syntactic sugar
    • 13
      Scalable
    • 10
      First-class functions
    • 10
      Type safety
    • 9
      Interactive REPL
    • 8
      Expressive
    • 7
      SBT
    • 6
      Case classes
    • 6
      Implicit parameters
    • 4
      Rapid and Safe Development using Functional Programming
    • 4
      JVM, OOP and Functional programming, and static typing
    • 4
      Object-oriented
    • 4
      Used by Twitter
    • 3
      Functional Proframming
    • 2
      Spark
    • 2
      Beautiful Code
    • 2
      Safety
    • 2
      Growing Community
    • 1
      DSL
    • 1
      Rich Static Types System and great Concurrency support
    • 1
      Naturally enforce high code quality
    • 1
      Akka Streams
    • 1
      Akka
    • 1
      Reactive Streams
    • 1
      Easy embedded DSLs
    • 1
      Mill build tool
    • 0
      Freedom to choose the right tools for a job

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of PySpark
    Cons of Scala
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 11
        Slow compilation time
      • 7
        Multiple ropes and styles to hang your self
      • 6
        Too few developers available
      • 4
        Complicated subtyping
      • 2
        My coworkers using scala are racist against other stuff

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions