StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Qemu vs VMware vSAN

Qemu vs VMware vSAN

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qemu
Qemu
Stacks105
Followers131
Votes3
VMware vSAN
VMware vSAN
Stacks16
Followers12
Votes0

Qemu vs VMware vSAN: What are the differences?

Introduction

The following Markdown code provides key differences between Qemu and VMware vSAN.

  1. Virtualization Type: Qemu is an open-source virtualization platform that provides emulation and virtualization capabilities, allowing users to run virtual machines on various host architectures. On the other hand, VMware vSAN is a software-defined storage solution that is part of the vSphere virtualization platform offered by VMware. It delivers high-performance, scalable, and resilient shared storage for virtual machines.

  2. Hypervisor Technology: Qemu uses a type 2 hypervisor, which means it runs on top of an existing operating system and provides virtualization capabilities on that host system. Conversely, VMware vSAN is built on VMware's mature type 1 hypervisor, known as ESXi, which directly runs on the bare metal hardware and provides better performance and resource management.

  3. Deployment Flexibility: Qemu can be deployed on various operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, providing flexibility in choosing the host platform. In contrast, VMware vSAN is tightly integrated with the VMware vSphere virtualization platform and can only be deployed on ESXi hosts, limiting the choice of host operating systems.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Qemu offers good scalability and performance for small to medium-sized virtual environments. However, VMware vSAN is designed to scale to large enterprise environments by utilizing distributed storage and parallel processing, providing high-performance storage capabilities for demanding workloads.

  5. Storage Management: Qemu provides basic storage management features that include creating disk images, attaching and detaching virtual disks, and managing disk formats. On the other hand, VMware vSAN offers advanced storage management capabilities, such as distributed RAID, data deduplication, and data compression, ensuring data protection and efficiency in a distributed storage environment.

  6. Availability and Redundancy: Qemu does not offer built-in high availability and redundancy features. In contrast, VMware vSAN provides advanced features like data replication, automatic failover, and fault tolerance, ensuring high availability and data redundancy for virtual machines and storage resources.

In Summary, Qemu is an open-source virtualization platform with a type 2 hypervisor, while VMware vSAN is a software-defined storage solution tightly integrated with the VMware vSphere virtualization platform, offering advanced storage management, scalability, and high availability features.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qemu
Qemu
VMware vSAN
VMware vSAN

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

It is enterprise-class, storage virtualization software that, when combined with vSphere, allows you to manage compute and storage with a single platform. You can reduce the cost and complexity of traditional storage and take the easiest path to hyperconverged infrastructure and hybrid cloud. Evolve to an integrated hyperconverged infrastructure (HCI) solution with vSAN to improve business agility, all while speeding operations and lowering costs.

machine emulator and virtualizer; dynamic translation;
Integrated with Your Hypervisor; Lower Costs; Power Traditional and Cloud-Native Applications; Private Cloud and Hybrid Cloud Ready
Statistics
Stacks
105
Stacks
16
Followers
131
Followers
12
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    Performance
  • 1
    Free
  • 1
    Easy to use
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Linux
Linux
KVM
KVM
VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Aliyun
Aliyun

What are some alternatives to Qemu, VMware vSAN?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Parallels

Parallels

It is an application and desktop virtualization software vendor that offers management and delivery platforms for Apple macOS and Microsoft Windows desktop deployments.

VMware Fusion

VMware Fusion

It gives Mac users the power to run Windows on Mac along with hundreds of other operating systems side by side with Mac applications, without rebooting. It is simple enough for home users and powerful enough for IT professionals, developers and businesses.

Xen

Xen

It is a hypervisor using a microkernel design, providing services that allow multiple computer operating systems to execute on the same computer hardware concurrently. It was developed by the Linux Foundation and is supported by Intel.

Oracle VM Server

Oracle VM Server

It is a zero license cost server virtualization and management solution that makes enterprise applications easier to deploy, manage, and support. Backed worldwide by affordable enterprise-quality support for both Oracle and non-Oracle environments, it reduces operations and support costs while increasing IT efficiency and agility.

Virtuozzo

Virtuozzo

It is an operating system-level server virtualization solution designed to centralize server management and consolidate workloads, which reduces overhead by reducing the number of physical servers required. Organizations use it for server consolidation, disaster recovery, and server workload agility.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana