StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Qt vs wxWidgets

Qt vs wxWidgets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Qt
Qt
Stacks464
Followers637
Votes138
wxWidgets
wxWidgets
Stacks21
Followers75
Votes19
GitHub Stars6.9K
Forks1.9K

Qt vs wxWidgets: What are the differences?

Comparison: Qt vs wxWidgets

Introduction:

When it comes to choosing a framework for developing cross-platform GUI applications, Qt and wxWidgets are two popular options. Both frameworks offer a variety of features and have their own advantages and disadvantages. In this article, we will compare the key differences between Qt and wxWidgets.

  1. Language Support: One of the major differences between Qt and wxWidgets is the programming language used. Qt primarily uses C++ and provides its own set of libraries, while wxWidgets supports multiple programming languages including C++, Python, and others. This makes wxWidgets more flexible for developers who prefer different languages.

  2. Look and Feel: Qt has its own set of native look and feel for different platforms, providing a consistent user interface across different operating systems. On the other hand, wxWidgets uses the native interface of the underlying operating system, resulting in a more platform-specific look and feel. This can be an advantage or a disadvantage depending on the specific requirements of the application.

  3. Development Tools: Qt offers comprehensive development tools including the Qt Creator IDE, which provides a rich set of features for designing, coding, and debugging applications. wxWidgets, on the other hand, relies on third-party IDEs such as Visual Studio or Code::Blocks. This means developers using wxWidgets may need to integrate different tools for their development workflow.

  4. Licensing: Qt offers both commercial and open-source licenses, allowing developers to choose the option that best fits their needs. wxWidgets, on the other hand, is completely open-source and available under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL). This can be a consideration for developers who have specific licensing requirements for their projects.

  5. Widget Set: Qt provides a comprehensive set of widgets that cover a wide range of requirements for GUI applications. Additionally, Qt allows developers to create custom widgets easily. On the other hand, wxWidgets offers a smaller set of widgets compared to Qt. While wxWidgets does include commonly used widgets, developers might need to create custom widgets or extend existing ones to meet specific needs.

  6. Community and Support: Qt has a large and active developer community with extensive documentation, forums, and online resources. It also benefits from support and updates from the Qt Company, which provides professional services and support for commercial licenses. wxWidgets also has an active community, but the level of support and resources might not be as extensive as that of Qt.

In Summary, Qt and wxWidgets are both powerful frameworks for developing cross-platform GUI applications. The choice between them depends on factors such as programming language preference, desired look and feel, development tools, licensing requirements, widget set, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Qt
Qt
wxWidgets
wxWidgets

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

-
Support for gesture events (GSoC 2017 project); Getting JavaScript code return value from wxWebView (also GSoC 2017 project); New wxSecretStore class for securely storing user passwords; New, available in parallel with the existing one, CMake build system; Support for context-sensitive translations.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
6.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.9K
Stacks
464
Stacks
21
Followers
637
Followers
75
Votes
138
Votes
19
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    High Performance
  • 13
    Declarative, easy and flexible UI
  • 12
    Cross platform
  • 12
    Performance
  • 9
    Fast prototyping
Cons
  • 5
    Paid
  • 4
    C++ is not so productive
  • 2
    Lack of community support
  • 1
    Lack of libraries
  • 1
    Not detailed documentation
Pros
  • 5
    Native looking UI
  • 4
    Learning Curve
  • 3
    Cross platform
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    Permissive license. Commercial with static linkage.
Cons
  • 1
    Uses Qt for GUI (wxQt)
Integrations
No integrations available
Perl
Perl
C++
C++
Windows
Windows
Linux
Linux
Python
Python
macOS
macOS
Ruby
Ruby

What are some alternatives to Qt, wxWidgets?

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Electron

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

PhoneGap

PhoneGap

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

Expo

Expo

It is a framework and a platform for universal React applications. It is a set of tools and services built around React Native and native platforms that help you develop, build, deploy, and quickly iterate on iOS, Android, and web apps.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase