StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Java Tools
  5. Quarkus vs Web3j

Quarkus vs Web3j

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Quarkus
Quarkus
Stacks312
Followers382
Votes80
GitHub Stars15.2K
Forks3.0K
Web3j
Web3j
Stacks43
Followers39
Votes0

Quarkus vs Web3j: What are the differences?

Introduction: Quarkus and Web3j are both popular frameworks used in software development, but they have significant differences that cater to different needs. Below are the key differences between Quarkus and Web3j.

  1. Runtime Efficiency: Quarkus is known for its impressive runtime efficiency, thanks to its use of GraalVM and optimizations such as dead code elimination. On the other hand, Web3j is a Java library specifically designed for integrating applications with the Ethereum blockchain, focusing more on blockchain-related functionalities rather than runtime efficiency.

  2. Primary Use Case: Quarkus is a Java framework optimized for cloud-based and microservices applications, providing tools and extensions for building scalable and lightweight applications. Meanwhile, Web3j is tailored for Ethereum blockchain developers, offering functionalities to interact with Ethereum networks, deploy smart contracts, and create decentralized applications (dApps).

  3. Community Support: Quarkus has a growing community of developers and contributors since its introduction, with a wide range of documentation, tutorials, and support available. In contrast, Web3j has a more niche community focusing on blockchain development, with resources dedicated to Ethereum and smart contract integrations.

  4. Language Support: Quarkus supports multiple programming languages such as Java, Kotlin, and Scala, while focusing on Java as its primary language. Web3j, on the other hand, is developed specifically for Java developers looking to interact with Ethereum blockchain networks, limiting its language support to Java only.

  5. Integration Capabilities: Quarkus offers a wide range of extensions and integrations with popular tools and frameworks to streamline development processes, making it easier to integrate various services and components. Web3j, on the other hand, mainly focuses on Ethereum-specific integrations and functionalities, limiting its scope to blockchain-related interactions.

  6. Deployment Options: Quarkus provides flexible deployment options, enabling developers to deploy applications in various environments, including containers, serverless, and traditional servers. In contrast, Web3j is primarily used for deploying applications on Ethereum networks, focusing on blockchain-specific deployment scenarios.

In Summary, Quarkus is optimized for cloud-native applications with a strong focus on runtime efficiency and integrations, while Web3j caters specifically to Ethereum blockchain developers with functionalities tailored for blockchain interactions and smart contract deployments.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Quarkus
Quarkus
Web3j
Web3j

It tailors your application for GraalVM and HotSpot. Amazingly fast boot time, incredibly low RSS memory (not just heap size!) offering near instant scale up and high density memory utilization in container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes. We use a technique we call compile time boot.

It is a lightweight, highly modular, reactive, type safe Java and Android library for working with Smart Contracts and integrating with clients (nodes) on the Ethereum network. This allows you to work with the Ethereum blockchain, without the additional overhead of having to write your own integration code for the platform.

CONTAINER FIRST; UNIFIES IMPERATIVE AND REACTIVE; BEST OF BREED LIBRARIES AND STANDARDS
Complete implementation of Ethereum's JSON-RPC client API over HTTP and IPC; Ethereum wallet support; Auto-generation of Java smart contract wrappers to create, deploy, transact with and call smart contracts from native Java code (Solidity and Truffle definition formats supported); Reactive-functional API for working with filters; Ethereum Name Service (ENS) support; Support for Parity's Personal, and Geth's Personal client APIs; Support for Infura, so you don't have to run an Ethereum client yourself
Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.2K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
312
Stacks
43
Followers
382
Followers
39
Votes
80
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 13
    Open source
  • 13
    Fast startup
  • 12
    Low memory footprint
  • 11
    Produce native code
  • 10
    Hot Reload
Cons
  • 2
    Boilerplate code when using Reflection
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Apache Camel
Apache Camel
Hibernate
Hibernate
Netty
Netty
Linux
Linux
macOS
macOS
Ethereum
Ethereum

What are some alternatives to Quarkus, Web3j?

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Ethereum

Ethereum

A decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference.

Hyperledger Fabric

Hyperledger Fabric

It is a collaborative effort created to advance blockchain technology by identifying and addressing important features and currently missing requirements. It leverages container technology to host smart contracts called “chaincode” that comprise the application logic of the system.

guava

guava

The Guava project contains several of Google's core libraries that we rely on in our Java-based projects: collections, caching, primitives support, concurrency libraries, common annotations, string processing, I/O, and so forth.

Thymeleaf

Thymeleaf

It is a modern server-side Java template engine for both web and standalone environments. It is aimed at creating elegant web code while adding powerful features and retaining prototyping abilities.

JSF

JSF

It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community

Tendermint

Tendermint

It is a software which can be used to achieve Byzantine fault tolerance (BFT) in any distributed computing platforms. It consists of two chief technical components: a blockchain consensus engine and a generic application interface.

MultiChain

MultiChain

It is a platform that helps users to establish a certain private Blockchains that can be used by the organizations for financial transactions.

JavaMelody

JavaMelody

It is used to monitor Java or Java EE application servers in QA and production environments. It is not a tool to simulate requests from users, it is a tool to measure and calculate statistics on real operation of an application depending on the usage of the application by users. It is mainly based on statistics of requests and on evolution charts.

RxJava

RxJava

A library for composing asynchronous and event-based programs by using observable sequences for the Java VM.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase