StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. RAKE vs Rails

RAKE vs Rails

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails
Rails
Stacks20.2K
Followers13.8K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks22.0K
Rake
Rake
Stacks56
Followers36
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.4K
Forks622

RAKE vs Rails: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between RAKE and Rails. Both RAKE and Rails are popular tools used in web development, but they have distinct differences. Let's explore these differences in detail.

  1. RAKE: RAKE is a task runner and build automation tool in Ruby, used for managing and running various tasks within a Ruby application. It allows developers to define custom tasks and automate repetitive processes. RAKE is primarily used for running command-line tasks, such as database migrations, running tests, or deploying code.

  2. Rails: Rails, also known as Ruby on Rails, is a full-stack web application framework built on top of the Ruby programming language. It provides a set of conventions and tools to make web development faster and easier. Rails follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architectural pattern and includes features like database management, routing, views, and controllers.

  3. Integration Level: RAKE operates at a lower level than Rails. It is a tool that can be used with any Ruby application, including Rails. On the other hand, Rails is a complete framework that includes RAKE and many other components, providing a higher level of abstraction and convenience for web development.

  4. Task Management: RAKE is primarily focused on task management and automation. Developers can define and execute tasks using RAKE, making it suitable for running scripts, performing system operations, and managing application-specific tasks. Rails, on the other hand, provides a broader framework for building web applications, with features like routing, database ORM, and view rendering built-in.

  5. Scope of Use: While RAKE is mainly used for command-line tasks, Rails is geared towards building web applications. Rails provides a development environment, conventions, and additional libraries that facilitate web development tasks such as handling HTTP requests, managing databases, and rendering views. RAKE is more versatile and can be used in any Ruby application, not just web development.

  6. Ease of Use: RAKE tasks can be easily defined and executed using custom scripts, making it straightforward for developers to manage individual tasks and automate repetitive processes. Rails, being a full-stack framework, has a steeper learning curve as it provides a more comprehensive set of features and requires understanding of the MVC pattern and Rails-specific conventions.

In summary, RAKE is a task runner and build automation tool focused on managing custom tasks, while Rails is a full-stack web application framework that includes RAKE and provides a higher level of abstraction for web development. RAKE operates at a lower level and can be used with any Ruby application, while Rails is specifically designed for building web applications, offering additional features and conventions.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rails, Rake

Shivam
Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceonNode.jsNode.jsJavaJavaRailsRails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

915k views915k
Comments
Ben
Ben

May 19, 2020

Decided

As a small team, we wanted to pick the framework which allowed us to move quickly. There's no option better than Rails. Not having to solve the fundamentals means we can more quickly build our feature set. No other framework can beat ActiveRecord in terms of integration & ease-of use. To top it all of, there's a lot of attention paid to security in the framework, making almost everything safe-by-default.

482k views482k
Comments
Felipe
Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails
Rails
Rake
Rake

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

It is a software task management and build automation tool. It allows the user to specify tasks and describe dependencies as well as to group tasks in a namespace.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
2.4K
GitHub Forks
22.0K
GitHub Forks
622
Stacks
20.2K
Stacks
56
Followers
13.8K
Followers
36
Votes
5.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 860
    Rapid development
  • 653
    Great gems
  • 607
    Great community
  • 486
    Convention over configuration
  • 418
    Mvc
Cons
  • 24
    Too much "magic" (hidden behavior)
  • 14
    Poor raw performance
  • 12
    Asset system is too primitive and outdated
  • 6
    Bloat in models
  • 6
    Heavy use of mixins
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rails, Rake?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase