StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Rails vs React

Rails vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rails
Rails
Stacks20.2K
Followers13.8K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars57.8K
Forks22.0K
React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K

Rails vs React: What are the differences?

Introduction

React and Ruby on Rails (Rails) are two popular frameworks used for web development. While both have their own strengths and are used in different scenarios, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Language: One of the main differences between Rails and React is the programming language they are built on. Rails is a full-stack web application framework that uses Ruby as its primary programming language. React, on the other hand, is a JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  2. Architecture: Rails follows the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture, which separates the application into three components: the model, the view, and the controller. React, on the other hand, follows a component-based architecture, where the user interface is built from reusable components.

  3. Server-Side vs Client-Side Rendering: Rails is primarily server-side rendered, where most of the processing and rendering happen on the server before sending the final HTML to the client. React, on the other hand, is primarily client-side rendered, where the processing and rendering happen on the client-side using JavaScript.

  4. Learning Curve: Rails is known for its convention-over-configuration principle, which means that developers need to follow certain conventions to build a Rails application. React, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve as it requires knowledge of JavaScript and the React ecosystem.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: Rails has a large and mature community with a wide range of plugins, gems, and libraries available for various functionalities. React also has a growing community and a rich ecosystem of libraries and tools, but it may not be as extensive as Rails.

  6. Purpose: Rails is well-suited for building large-scale web applications with complex business logic. It provides a complete framework with built-in features for handling databases, routing, and authentication. React, on the other hand, is more focused on building interactive user interfaces and is commonly used in combination with other frameworks or technologies to build a full-stack application.

In summary, Rails and React have several key differences including the programming language used, architecture, rendering approach, learning curve, community and ecosystem, and their purpose in web development. Each framework has its own strengths and is suited for different scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rails, React

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Christopher
Christopher

Web Developer at NurseryPeople

Mar 12, 2020

Decided

When I started on this project as the sole developer, I was new to web development and I was looking at all of the web frameworks available for the job. I had some experience with Ruby on Rails and I had looked into .net for a bit, but when I found Laravel, it felt like the best framework for me to get the product to market. What made me choose Laravel was the easy to read documentation and active community. Rails had great documentation, but lacked some features built in that I wanted out of the box, while .net had a ton of video documentation tutorials, but nothing as straightforward as Laravels. So far, I am happy with the decision I made, and looking forward to the website release!

424k views424k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails
Rails
React
React

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

-
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
Statistics
GitHub Stars
57.8K
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Forks
22.0K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
Stacks
20.2K
Stacks
182.6K
Followers
13.8K
Followers
147.0K
Votes
5.5K
Votes
4.1K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 860
    Rapid development
  • 653
    Great gems
  • 607
    Great community
  • 486
    Convention over configuration
  • 418
    Mvc
Cons
  • 24
    Too much "magic" (hidden behavior)
  • 14
    Poor raw performance
  • 12
    Asset system is too primitive and outdated
  • 6
    Bloat in models
  • 6
    Heavy use of mixins
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Integrations
Ruby
Ruby
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rails, React?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase