Rails vs RubyMotion

Overview

Rails

Stacks20.2K

Followers13.8K

Votes5.5K

GitHub Stars57.8K

Forks22.0K

RubyMotion

Stacks25

Followers54

Votes25

Rails vs RubyMotion: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight key differences between Rails and RubyMotion.

Development Focus: Rails is a web application framework designed for server-side development using the Ruby programming language, while RubyMotion is a toolchain for building native iOS, Android, and OS X apps using Ruby. Rails primarily focuses on web development, whereas RubyMotion caters to native mobile application development.
Target Platform: Rails applications are meant to run on web servers, interacting with browsers through HTTP to render web pages, while RubyMotion allows developers to create standalone mobile applications that can be deployed directly to mobile devices. Rails is specifically for server-side web applications, whereas RubyMotion is tailored for mobile app development.
Language Environment: In Rails development, developers primarily work with Ruby code that runs on a web server, utilizing the Rails framework for web application development. In contrast, RubyMotion allows developers to write Ruby code that compiles to native code for iOS and Android devices, enabling the creation of standalone mobile applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Rails has a large and active community of developers, abundant resources, and a well-established ecosystem of libraries and plugins for web development. On the other hand, RubyMotion has a smaller community focused on mobile app development, with specific resources and tools tailored to building native apps for iOS, Android, and OS X platforms.
Deployment and Distribution: Rails applications are typically deployed to web servers where they can be accessed by users through web browsers, utilizing web servers like Apache or Nginx. RubyMotion applications, on the other hand, are built as standalone mobile apps that can be distributed through app stores such as the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for iOS and Android respectively.
Learning Curve: Rails is relatively easier to learn for developers familiar with Ruby and web development concepts due to its focus on web applications and the availability of extensive documentation and resources. RubyMotion, on the other hand, requires developers to learn the specifics of native mobile app development along with Ruby, potentially steepening the learning curve for those new to mobile development.

In Summary, the key differences between Rails and RubyMotion lie in their development focus, target platforms, language environments, community and ecosystem, deployment methods, and learning curves.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Rails, RubyMotion

Shivam

AVP - Business at VAYUZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Mar 25, 2020

Needs adviceon

Node.js

Java

Rails

Hi Community! Trust everyone is keeping safe. I am exploring the idea of building a #Neobank (App) with end-to-end banking capabilities. In the process of exploring this space, I have come across multiple Apps (N26, Revolut, Monese, etc) and explored their stacks in detail. The confusion remains to be the Backend Tech to be used?

What would you go with considering all of the languages such as Node.js Java Rails Python are suggested by some person or the other. As a general trend, I have noticed the usage of Node with React on the front or Node with a combination of Kotlin and Swift. Please suggest what would be the right approach!

916k views916k

Comments

Ben

May 19, 2020

Decided

As a small team, we wanted to pick the framework which allowed us to move quickly. There's no option better than Rails. Not having to solve the fundamentals means we can more quickly build our feature set. No other framework can beat ActiveRecord in terms of integration & ease-of use. To top it all of, there's a lot of attention paid to security in the framework, making almost everything safe-by-default.

482k views482k

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Decided

Since I came from python I had two choices: #django or #flask. It felt like it was a better idea to go for #django considering I was building a blogging platform, this is kind of what #django was made for. On the other hand, #rails seems to be a fantastic framework to get things done. Although I do not regret any of my time spent on developing with #django I want to give @{#rails}|topic:null| a try some day in the future for the sake of curiosity.

438k views438k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rails	RubyMotion
Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.	RubyMotion lets you quickly develop cross-platform native apps for iOS, Android and OS X, all using your favorite editor and the awesome Ruby language you know and love.
Statistics
GitHub Stars 57.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 22.0K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 20.2K	Stacks 25
Followers 13.8K	Followers 54
Votes 5.5K	Votes 25
Pros & Cons
Pros 860 Rapid development 653 Great gems 607 Great community 486 Convention over configuration 418 Mvc Cons 24 Too much "magic" (hidden behavior) 14 Poor raw performance 12 Asset system is too primitive and outdated 6 Bloat in models 6 Heavy use of mixins	Pros 6 Ruby Syntax 4 Great Community 4 Editor + Terminal workflow; minimal Xcode involvement 3 Fast Prototyping 3 Great gems, libraries, and frameworks
Integrations
Ruby	Ruby

What are some alternatives to Rails, RubyMotion?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Rails vs RubyMotion: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this comparison, we will highlight key differences between Rails and RubyMotion.

Development Focus: Rails is a web application framework designed for server-side development using the Ruby programming language, while RubyMotion is a toolchain for building native iOS, Android, and OS X apps using Ruby. Rails primarily focuses on web development, whereas RubyMotion caters to native mobile application development.
Target Platform: Rails applications are meant to run on web servers, interacting with browsers through HTTP to render web pages, while RubyMotion allows developers to create standalone mobile applications that can be deployed directly to mobile devices. Rails is specifically for server-side web applications, whereas RubyMotion is tailored for mobile app development.
Language Environment: In Rails development, developers primarily work with Ruby code that runs on a web server, utilizing the Rails framework for web application development. In contrast, RubyMotion allows developers to write Ruby code that compiles to native code for iOS and Android devices, enabling the creation of standalone mobile applications.
Community and Ecosystem: Rails has a large and active community of developers, abundant resources, and a well-established ecosystem of libraries and plugins for web development. On the other hand, RubyMotion has a smaller community focused on mobile app development, with specific resources and tools tailored to building native apps for iOS, Android, and OS X platforms.
Deployment and Distribution: Rails applications are typically deployed to web servers where they can be accessed by users through web browsers, utilizing web servers like Apache or Nginx. RubyMotion applications, on the other hand, are built as standalone mobile apps that can be distributed through app stores such as the Apple App Store or Google Play Store for iOS and Android respectively.
Learning Curve: Rails is relatively easier to learn for developers familiar with Ruby and web development concepts due to its focus on web applications and the availability of extensive documentation and resources. RubyMotion, on the other hand, requires developers to learn the specifics of native mobile app development along with Ruby, potentially steepening the learning curve for those new to mobile development.

In Summary, the key differences between Rails and RubyMotion lie in their development focus, target platforms, language environments, community and ecosystem, deployment methods, and learning curves.

Rails vs RubyMotion

Overview

Rails vs RubyMotion: What are the differences?