Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache RocketMQ

47
199
+ 1
8
VerneMQ

31
136
+ 1
6
Add tool

Apache RocketMQ vs VerneMQ: What are the differences?

Developers describe Apache RocketMQ as "Open source distributed messaging and streaming data platform". Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability. On the other hand, VerneMQ is detailed as "VerneMQ is a distributed IoT/MQTT message broker". VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications..

Apache RocketMQ and VerneMQ can be primarily classified as "Message Queue" tools.

Apache RocketMQ and VerneMQ are both open source tools. Apache RocketMQ with 8.26K GitHub stars and 4.24K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than VerneMQ with 1.76K GitHub stars and 189 GitHub forks.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache RocketMQ
Pros of VerneMQ
  • 2
    Million-level message accumulation capacity in a single
  • 2
    Support tracing message and transactional message
  • 1
    BigData Friendly
  • 1
    High throughput messaging
  • 1
    Feature-rich administrative dashboard for configuration
  • 1
    Low latency
  • 1
    Fully open source clustering
  • 1
    Proxy Protocol support
  • 1
    Open Source Plugin System
  • 1
    Open Source Message and Metadata Persistence
  • 1
    MQTT v5 implementation
  • 1
    Open source shared subscriptions

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

What is Apache RocketMQ?

Apache RocketMQ is a distributed messaging and streaming platform with low latency, high performance and reliability, trillion-level capacity and flexible scalability.

What is VerneMQ?

VerneMQ is a distributed MQTT message broker, implemented in Erlang/OTP. It's open source, and Apache 2 licensed. VerneMQ implements the MQTT 3.1, 3.1.1 and 5.0 specifications.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use Apache RocketMQ?
What companies use VerneMQ?
See which teams inside your own company are using Apache RocketMQ or VerneMQ.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with Apache RocketMQ?
What tools integrate with VerneMQ?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

What are some alternatives to Apache RocketMQ and VerneMQ?
Kafka
Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.
ActiveMQ
Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.
Amazon SQS
Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.
Celery
Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
See all alternatives