StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Authentication
  4. User Management And Authentication
  5. RSA SecurID vs Spring Security

RSA SecurID vs Spring Security

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Security
Spring Security
Stacks558
Followers589
Votes6
GitHub Stars9.4K
Forks6.2K
RSA SecurID
RSA SecurID
Stacks5
Followers15
Votes0

RSA SecurID vs Spring Security: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will provide the key differences between RSA SecurID and Spring Security. RSA SecurID is a popular multi-factor authentication (MFA) solution while Spring Security is a framework that provides security features for Java applications.

  1. Integration: RSA SecurID is a standalone MFA system that can be integrated with various applications and systems to provide an additional layer of security. On the other hand, Spring Security is a framework that can be integrated within Java applications to handle authentication, authorization, and other security-related tasks.

  2. Authentication: RSA SecurID primarily focuses on providing strong authentication by generating one-time passwords (OTPs) that are valid for a short duration. These OTPs are generated based on a unique token associated with each user. In contrast, Spring Security provides a comprehensive authentication mechanism that supports various authentication approaches such as username/password, OAuth, LDAP, and more.

  3. Flexibility: RSA SecurID offers limited flexibility in terms of customizations and configurations as it is a standardized MFA solution. On the contrary, Spring Security provides a high degree of flexibility and extensibility, allowing developers to customize the authentication and authorization processes according to their specific requirements.

  4. Usage: RSA SecurID is commonly used in environments where strong authentication is required, such as government organizations, financial institutions, and large enterprises. It is often used in conjunction with other security measures to enhance overall security. Spring Security, on the other hand, is widely used in Java-based applications of all types and sizes, offering a broad range of security features beyond just authentication.

  5. Maintenance and Support: RSA SecurID typically requires specific hardware tokens or software-based tokens that need to be issued and maintained for each user. The system also requires dedicated servers for the generation and validation of OTPs. In comparison, Spring Security is a software-based solution that can be easily maintained and supported by developers without the need for specialized hardware or additional infrastructure.

  6. Scalability: RSA SecurID may face scalability challenges in large-scale deployments, as it may require significant investments in hardware and infrastructure to support a high number of users. In contrast, Spring Security scales well in distributed environments and can handle a large number of concurrent users by leveraging the underlying capabilities of the application server or cloud infrastructure.

In Summary, RSA SecurID is a standalone MFA system focused on strong authentication and integration with applications, while Spring Security is a flexible framework designed to provide comprehensive security features for Java applications, including authentication, authorization, and more.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Spring Security, RSA SecurID

sindhujasrivastava
sindhujasrivastava

Jan 16, 2020

Needs advice

I am working on building a platform in my company that will provide a single sign on to all of the internal products to the customer. To do that we need to build an Authorisation server to comply with the OIDC protocol. Earlier we had built the Auth server using the Spring Security OAuth project but since in Spring Security 5.x it is no longer supported we are planning to get over with it as well. Below are the 2 options that I was considering to replace the Spring Auth Server.

  1. Keycloak
  2. Okta
  3. Auth0 Please advise which one to use.
258k views258k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring Security
Spring Security
RSA SecurID
RSA SecurID

It is a framework that focuses on providing both authentication and authorization to Java applications. The real power of Spring Security is found in how easily it can be extended to meet custom requirements.

It is a mechanism developed by Security Dynamics for performing two-factor authentication for a user to a network resource.

Comprehensive; Servlet API integration; Protection against attacks
Modern authentication; Access and SSO; Identity governance and lifecycle
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
6.2K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
558
Stacks
5
Followers
589
Followers
15
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Easy to use
  • 3
    Java integration
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Spring MVC
Spring MVC
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Spring Security, RSA SecurID?

Auth0

Auth0

A set of unified APIs and tools that instantly enables Single Sign On and user management to all your applications.

Stormpath

Stormpath

Stormpath is an authentication and user management service that helps development teams quickly and securely build web and mobile applications and services.

Keycloak

Keycloak

It is an Open Source Identity and Access Management For Modern Applications and Services. It adds authentication to applications and secure services with minimum fuss. No need to deal with storing users or authenticating users. It's all available out of the box.

Devise

Devise

Devise is a flexible authentication solution for Rails based on Warden

Firebase Authentication

Firebase Authentication

It provides backend services, easy-to-use SDKs, and ready-made UI libraries to authenticate users to your app. It supports authentication using passwords, phone numbers, popular federated identity providers like Google,

Amazon Cognito

Amazon Cognito

You can create unique identities for your users through a number of public login providers (Amazon, Facebook, and Google) and also support unauthenticated guests. You can save app data locally on users’ devices allowing your applications to work even when the devices are offline.

WorkOS

WorkOS

Start selling to enterprise customers with just a few lines of code.

OAuth.io

OAuth.io

OAuth is a protocol that aimed to provide a single secure recipe to manage authorizations. It is now used by almost every web application. However, 30+ different implementations coexist. OAuth.io fixes this massive problem by acting as a universal adapter, thanks to a robust API. With OAuth.io integrating OAuth takes minutes instead of hours or days.

OmniAuth

OmniAuth

OmniAuth is a Ruby authentication framework aimed to abstract away the difficulties of working with various types of authentication providers. It is meant to be hooked up to just about any system, from social networks to enterprise systems to simple username and password authentication.

ORY Hydra

ORY Hydra

It is a self-managed server that secures access to your applications and APIs with OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect. It is OpenID Connect Certified and optimized for latency, high throughput, and low resource consumption.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope