StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Languages
  4. Rubygems Packages
  5. byebug vs pry

byebug vs pry

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

pry
pry
Stacks1.5K
Followers3
Votes0
GitHub Stars6.7K
Forks611
byebug
byebug
Stacks688
Followers0
Votes0
GitHub Stars3.3K
Forks334

byebug vs pry: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will discuss the key differences between byebug and pry, two popular debugging tools used in Ruby programming.

  1. Installation: byebug can be installed by adding it to the Gemfile or using the gem install command. On the other hand, pry needs to be explicitly required in the code or in the Gemfile, and can be installed using the gem install command.

  2. User Interface: byebug provides a simpler and more basic command-line interface (CLI) for debugging, offering limited features compared to pry. Whereas, pry provides an enhanced command-line interface with additional features, such as code navigation, source code introspection, and improved object inspection.

  3. Features: byebug provides basic debugging functionalities, such as breakpoints, step-by-step execution, variable inspection, and stack navigation. However, it lacks advanced features like syntax highlighting, method source displaying, and interactive program exploration. In contrast, pry offers a broader range of features, including syntax highlighting, method source retrieval, context exploration, powerful switching and navigation between different scopes, and support for reloading code.

  4. Extensibility: byebug provides limited possibilities for extending its functionalities. While it is possible to add custom commands or define custom display formats, byebug lacks the flexibility and extensibility offered by pry. Pry, being highly extensible, allows users to define custom commands and keybindings, create new plugins, and customize the prompt and console behavior according to their requirements.

  5. Integration: byebug is commonly used as a standalone debugger, integrated with the Ruby program. It can be started at any point in the code using a breakpoint. On the other hand, pry is often used as an interactive shell in addition to a debugger, allowing developers to explore and test code snippets within the context of their program.

  6. Documentation and Community: byebug has a solid documentation available, including its various options and commands, making it easy for developers to get started. Pry also offers comprehensive documentation, along with a broader community support as it has been widely adopted in the Ruby community.

In summary, byebug is a simpler, minimalistic debugger with fewer features and extensibility options, while pry is a more powerful and flexible debugger that offers advanced features, extensibility possibilities, an enhanced user interface, and improved user experience.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

pry
pry
byebug
byebug

An IRB alternative and runtime developer console.

Byebug is a Ruby debugger. It's implemented using the TracePoint C API for execution control and the Debug Inspector C API for call stack navigation. The core component provides support that front-ends can build on. It provides breakpoint handling and bindings for stack frames among other things and it comes with an easy to use command line interface.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.7K
GitHub Stars
3.3K
GitHub Forks
611
GitHub Forks
334
Stacks
1.5K
Stacks
688
Followers
3
Followers
0
Votes
0
Votes
0

What are some alternatives to pry, byebug?

rake

rake

Rake is a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. Rake has the following features: * Rakefiles (rake's version of Makefiles) are completely defined in standard Ruby syntax. No XML files to edit. No quirky Makefile syntax to worry about (is that a tab or a space?) * Users can specify tasks with prerequisites. * Rake supports rule patterns to synthesize implicit tasks. * Flexible FileLists that act like arrays but know about manipulating file names and paths. * Supports parallel execution of tasks.

rspec

rspec

BDD for Ruby.

rails

rails

Ruby on Rails is a full-stack web framework optimized for programmer happiness and sustainable productivity. It encourages beautiful code by favoring convention over configuration.

simplecov

simplecov

Code coverage for Ruby 1.9+ with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites.

puma

puma

Puma is a simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Puma is intended for use in both development and production environments. It's great for highly concurrent Ruby implementations such as Rubinius and JRuby as well as as providing process worker support to support CRuby well.

pg

pg

Pg is the Ruby interface to the {PostgreSQL RDBMS}[http://www.postgresql.org/]. It works with {PostgreSQL 9.2 and later}[http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning/]. A small example usage: #!/usr/bin/env ruby require 'pg' # Output a table of current connections to the DB conn = PG.connect( dbname: 'sales' ) conn.exec( "SELECT * FROM pg_stat_activity" ) do |result| puts " PID | User | Query" result.each do |row| puts " %7d | %-16s | %s " % row.values_at('procpid', 'usename', 'current_query') end end.

rspec-rails

rspec-rails

Rspec-rails is a testing framework for Rails 3+.

rubocop

rubocop

Automatic Ruby code style checking tool. Aims to enforce the community-driven Ruby Style Guide.

uglifier

uglifier

Uglifier minifies JavaScript files by wrapping UglifyJS to be accessible in Ruby.

tzinfo-data

tzinfo-data

TZInfo::Data contains data from the IANA Time Zone database packaged as Ruby modules for use with TZInfo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase