RubyMotion vs Ubuntu

Overview

RubyMotion

Stacks25

Followers54

Votes25

Ubuntu

Stacks80.4K

Followers59.1K

Votes468

RubyMotion vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?

Syntax and Purpose: RubyMotion is a toolchain that allows developers to write iOS and macOS applications using the Ruby programming language, while Ubuntu is a Linux-based operating system that is free and open-source.
Development Environment: RubyMotion provides a more streamlined and specific development environment for building mobile applications, whereas Ubuntu is a complete operating system designed for general-purpose computing.
Target Platform: RubyMotion primarily targets iOS and macOS platforms for app development, while Ubuntu is designed to run on a wide range of devices including desktops, servers, and IoT devices.
Community and Support: RubyMotion has a smaller community and support compared to the large user base and extensive support available for Ubuntu.
Cost: RubyMotion requires a paid license for full functionality, while Ubuntu is free to download and use without any licensing fees.
Programming Language: RubyMotion uses the Ruby programming language for app development, while Ubuntu supports multiple programming languages for software development including C, C++, Python, and more.

In Summary, RubyMotion and Ubuntu differ in terms of target platforms, development environment, community support, cost, programming language, and purpose.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on RubyMotion, Ubuntu

Jerome/Zen

Software Engineer

Aug 2, 2020

Decided

Global familiarity, free, widely used, and as a debian distro feels more comfortable when rapidly switching between local macOS and remote command lines.

CentOS does boast quite a few security/stability improvements, however as a RHEL-based distro, differs quite significantly in the command line and suffers from slightly less frequent package updates. (Could be a good or bad thing depending on your use-case and if it is public facing)

271k views271k

Comments

Simon

Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact

Mar 7, 2020

Decided

At the moment of the decision, my desktop was the primary place I did work. Due to this, I can't have it blow up on me while I work. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS installation.

299k views299k

Comments

Govind

Aug 5, 2020

Decided

Ubuntu is much more faster over Windows and helps to get software and other utilities easier and within a short span of time compared to Windows.

Ubuntu helps to get robustness and resiliency over Windows. Ubuntu runs faster than Windows on every computer that I have ever tested. LibreOffice (Ubuntu's default office suite) runs much faster than Microsoft Office on every computer that I have ever tested.

270k views270k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

RubyMotion	Ubuntu
RubyMotion lets you quickly develop cross-platform native apps for iOS, Android and OS X, all using your favorite editor and the awesome Ruby language you know and love.	Ubuntu is an ancient African word meaning ‘humanity to others’. It also means ‘I am what I am because of who we all are’. The Ubuntu operating system brings the spirit of Ubuntu to the world of computers.
Statistics
Stacks 25	Stacks 80.4K
Followers 54	Followers 59.1K
Votes 25	Votes 468
Pros & Cons
Pros 6 Ruby Syntax 4 Editor + Terminal workflow; minimal Xcode involvement 4 Great Community 3 Fast Prototyping 3 Great gems, libraries, and frameworks	Pros 230 Free to use 96 Easy setup for testing discord bot 57 Gateway Linux Distro 54 Simple interface 9 Don't need driver installation in most cases Cons 5 Demanding system requirements 4 Adds overhead and unnecessary complexity over Debian 2 Snapd installed by default 1 Systemd
Integrations
Ruby	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to RubyMotion, Ubuntu?

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Apache Cordova

Apache Cordova is a set of device APIs that allow a mobile app developer to access native device function such as the camera or accelerometer from JavaScript. Combined with a UI framework such as jQuery Mobile or Dojo Mobile or Sencha Touch, this allows a smartphone app to be developed with just HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

Framework7

It is a free and open source mobile HTML framework to develop hybrid mobile apps or web apps with iOS native look and feel. All you need to make it work is a simple HTML layout and attached framework's CSS and JS files.

Debian

Debian systems currently use the Linux kernel or the FreeBSD kernel. Linux is a piece of software started by Linus Torvalds and supported by thousands of programmers worldwide. FreeBSD is an operating system including a kernel and other software.

Qt

Qt, a leading cross-platform application and UI framework. With Qt, you can develop applications once and deploy to leading desktop, embedded & mobile targets.

Arch Linux

A lightweight and flexible Linux distribution that tries to Keep It Simple.

Related Comparisons

RubyMotion vs Ubuntu: What are the differences?

Syntax and Purpose: RubyMotion is a toolchain that allows developers to write iOS and macOS applications using the Ruby programming language, while Ubuntu is a Linux-based operating system that is free and open-source.
Development Environment: RubyMotion provides a more streamlined and specific development environment for building mobile applications, whereas Ubuntu is a complete operating system designed for general-purpose computing.
Target Platform: RubyMotion primarily targets iOS and macOS platforms for app development, while Ubuntu is designed to run on a wide range of devices including desktops, servers, and IoT devices.
Community and Support: RubyMotion has a smaller community and support compared to the large user base and extensive support available for Ubuntu.
Cost: RubyMotion requires a paid license for full functionality, while Ubuntu is free to download and use without any licensing fees.
Programming Language: RubyMotion uses the Ruby programming language for app development, while Ubuntu supports multiple programming languages for software development including C, C++, Python, and more.

In Summary, RubyMotion and Ubuntu differ in terms of target platforms, development environment, community support, cost, programming language, and purpose.

RubyMotion vs Ubuntu

Overview