StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Templating Languages & Extensions
  4. CSS Pre Processors Extensions
  5. Sass vs TypeScript

Sass vs TypeScript

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Sass
Sass
Stacks44.8K
Followers32.2K
Votes3.0K
GitHub Stars15.3K
Forks2.2K
TypeScript
TypeScript
Stacks105.1K
Followers74.2K
Votes503
GitHub Stars106.6K
Forks13.1K

Sass vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown document, we will outline key differences between Sass and TypeScript, highlighting specific points for developers to consider when choosing between the two technologies.

1. Syntax and Purpose: Sass is a preprocessor scripting language that is interpreted or compiled into Cascading Style Sheets (CSS), enhancing the functionality of CSS with features like variables, nesting, and mixins. On the other hand, TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that adds optional static typing to the language, enabling developers to catch errors at compile time and write more predictable code.

2. Use Case: Sass is primarily used to simplify and streamline the process of writing and managing CSS stylesheets, making them more maintainable and reusable across projects. In contrast, TypeScript is aimed at improving the development experience and avoiding common pitfalls in JavaScript code, making it easier to scale and maintain larger codebases.

3. Browser Compatibility: Sass is a preprocessor tool that generates regular CSS code, which is supported by all modern browsers. TypeScript, however, needs to be transpiled into JavaScript code to ensure compatibility with a wide range of browsers, which adds an extra step to the development process.

4. Tooling and Ecosystem: Sass has a robust ecosystem of tools and libraries, such as Node-sass and Sass-lint, to enhance the developer experience and streamline the workflow. TypeScript, on the other hand, comes with its own compiler, TypeScript Compiler (tsc), and has strong support from popular IDEs like Visual Studio Code.

5. Learning Curve: Sass is relatively easy for web developers with CSS experience to pick up, as it builds on top of CSS concepts and introduces new features gradually. In contrast, TypeScript may have a steeper learning curve for developers new to statically typed languages, but it can provide significant benefits in terms of code quality and maintainability once mastered.

6. Community Support: Sass has a long-standing community of designers and front-end developers who actively contribute to the Sass ecosystem, share best practices, and create resources for fellow users. TypeScript, backed by Microsoft, has gained increasing popularity and has a growing community of developers who contribute to its development and share knowledge through forums and online communities.

In Summary, Sass and TypeScript have distinct purposes and target different aspects of web development, with Sass focusing on enhancing CSS styling capabilities and TypeScript adding static typing to JavaScript for improved code maintainability and scalability.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Sass, TypeScript

Jarvis
Jarvis

May 16, 2019

ReviewonTypeScriptTypeScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k
Comments
David
David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

ReviewonJavaScriptJavaScriptFlow (JS)Flow (JS)TypeScriptTypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Aug 13, 2019

Needs adviceonTypeScriptTypeScriptCoffeeScriptCoffeeScriptJavaScriptJavaScript

From a StackShare community member: "We are looking to rewrite our outdated front-end with TypeScript. Right now we have a mix of CoffeeScript and vanilla JavaScript. I have read that adopting TypeScript can help enforce better code quality, and best practices. I also heard good things about Flow (JS). Which one would you recommend and why?"

405k views405k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sass
Sass
TypeScript
TypeScript

Sass is an extension of CSS3, adding nested rules, variables, mixins, selector inheritance, and more. It's translated to well-formatted, standard CSS using the command line tool or a web-framework plugin.

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
15.3K
GitHub Stars
106.6K
GitHub Forks
2.2K
GitHub Forks
13.1K
Stacks
44.8K
Stacks
105.1K
Followers
32.2K
Followers
74.2K
Votes
3.0K
Votes
503
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 613
    Variables
  • 594
    Mixins
  • 466
    Nested rules
  • 410
    Maintainable
  • 300
    Functions
Cons
  • 6
    Needs to be compiled
Pros
  • 173
    More intuitive and type safe javascript
  • 105
    Type safe
  • 80
    JavaScript superset
  • 48
    The best AltJS ever
  • 27
    Best AltJS for BackEnd
Cons
  • 5
    Code may look heavy and confusing
  • 4
    Hype

What are some alternatives to Sass, TypeScript?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase