Selendroid vs TestWheel
Overview
Share your Stack
Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.
CLI (Node.js)
Manual
Detailed Comparison
Selendroid is a test automation framework which drives off the UI of Android native and hybrid applications (apps) and the mobile web. Tests are written using the Selenium 2 client API | TestWheel is an AI-powered, no-code software testing platform for fast, end-to-end testing across web and mobile applications, API, and performance tests. |
Full compatibility with the JSON Wire Protocol/Selenium 3 Ready.;No modification of app under test required in order to automate it;Testing the mobile web using built in Android driver webview app;Same concept for automating native or hybrid apps;UI elements can be found by different locator types;Gestures are supported: Advanced User Interactions API;Selendroid can interact with multiple Android devices (emulators or hardware devices) at the same time;Existing Emulators are started automatically;Selendroid supports hot plugging of hardware devices;Full integration as a node into Selenium Grid for scaling and parallel testing;Multiple Android target API support (10 to 19);Built in Inspector to simplify test case development.;Selendroid can be extended at runtime with your own extensions | Software Test Automation, Software Testing, AI Software Testing, Self Healing Test Automation, AI Test Case Generator, Web Application Testing, Native Mobile Testing, API Testing |
Statistics | |
GitHub Stars 893 | GitHub Stars - |
GitHub Forks 435 | GitHub Forks - |
Stacks 21 | Stacks 0 |
Followers 62 | Followers 1 |
Votes 0 | Votes 1 |
Integrations | |
| No integrations available | |
What are some alternatives to Selendroid, TestWheel?
Robot Framework
It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.
Karate DSL
Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.
BitBar
Testdroid provides a set of products for Android and iOS app/game testing on real devices. With different testing solutions, you can efficiently develop and test your mobile apps/games in agile way and achieve your business goals.
Cucumber
Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.
TestCafe
It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.
Spock Framework
It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.
Selenide
It is a library for writing concise, readable, boilerplate-free tests in Java using Selenium WebDriver.
Capybara
Capybara helps you test web applications by simulating how a real user would interact with your app. It is agnostic about the driver running your tests and comes with Rack::Test and Selenium support built in. WebKit is supported through an external gem.
PHPUnit
PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
Detox
High velocity native mobile development requires us to adopt continuous integration workflows, which means our reliance on manual QA has to drop significantly. It tests your mobile app while it's running in a real device/simulator, interacting with it just like a real user.
