StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Front End Frameworks
  5. Semantic UI vs UDash

Semantic UI vs UDash

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
Stacks992
Followers1.5K
Votes673
GitHub Stars51.2K
Forks4.9K
UDash
UDash
Stacks1
Followers7
Votes11
GitHub Stars449
Forks37

Semantic UI vs UDash: What are the differences?

Developers describe Semantic UI as "A UI Component library implemented using a set of specifications designed around natural language". Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI. On the other hand, UDash is detailed as "Scala and Scala.js Reactive Web Framework". A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.

Semantic UI and UDash belong to "Front-End Frameworks" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Semantic UI are:

  • Build Responsive Layouts Easier
  • Self Explanatory
  • Tag ambivalent

On the other hand, UDash provides the following key features:

  • Shared Scala code
  • Type-safe
  • Compiled to JavaScript

Semantic UI and UDash are both open source tools. It seems that Semantic UI with 45.9K GitHub stars and 4.84K forks on GitHub has more adoption than UDash with 348 GitHub stars and 28 GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Semantic UI, UDash

Kwasi
Kwasi

CTO

Feb 23, 2021

Review

You can choose between Angular Material or PrimeNG, if you have experience in integrating third party javascript libs you can use SemanticUI , Bootstrap or Foundation. All above UI Frameworks support side navigation with off page canavas implementation.

9.26k views9.26k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Semantic UI
Semantic UI
UDash
UDash

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

A Scala.js framework for building beautiful and maintainable web applications.

Build Responsive Layouts Easier;Self Explanatory;Tag ambivalent;Powerful tools for expressing groups and collections;Portable and self-contained
Shared Scala code; Type-safe; Compiled to JavaScript; Reactive data bindings; UI components; CSS; i18n; Generator; Backend independent; Open Source; IDE support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
51.2K
GitHub Stars
449
GitHub Forks
4.9K
GitHub Forks
37
Stacks
992
Stacks
1
Followers
1.5K
Followers
7
Votes
673
Votes
11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 157
    Easy to use and looks elegant
  • 92
    Variety of components
  • 64
    Themes
  • 61
    Has out-of-the-box widgets i would actually use
  • 57
    Semantic, duh
Cons
  • 5
    Outdated build tool (gulp 3))
  • 3
    HTML is not semantic (see list component)
  • 3
    Poor accessibility support
  • 2
    Javascript is tied to jquery
Pros
  • 1
    Type-safe CSS
  • 1
    I18n
  • 1
    Generator
  • 1
    Backend independent
  • 1
    IDE support
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
React
React
Ember.js
Ember.js
Meteor
Meteor
Scala
Scala
JavaScript
JavaScript
jQuery
jQuery
Bootstrap
Bootstrap

What are some alternatives to Semantic UI, UDash?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Blazor

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase