StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Log Management
  4. Logging Tools
  5. Seq vs Zap

Seq vs Zap

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Seq
Seq
Stacks134
Followers140
Votes26
Zap
Zap
Stacks10
Followers33
Votes0
GitHub Stars23.9K
Forks1.5K

Seq vs Zap: What are the differences?

Introduction

Markdown is a lightweight markup language that can be used to format text on a website. In this task, we will format the information about the key differences between Seq and Zap as Markdown code that can be used on a website.

1. Data Structure:

Seq: Seq is a sequence container that stores elements in a linear order and allows efficient random access to individual elements.

Zap: Zap is an associative container that stores elements as key-value pairs and allows efficient retrieval of values based on keys.

2. Duplicates:

Seq: Seq allows duplicate elements to be stored in the container.

Zap: Zap does not allow duplicate keys. If a duplicate key is inserted, the existing value associated with that key is replaced.

3. Iteration:

Seq: Seq supports sequential iteration over the elements using iterators.

Zap: Zap supports iteration over the key-value pairs using iterators.

4. Sorting:

Seq: Seq does not provide any built-in sorting functionality. However, elements can be sorted using custom comparison functions.

Zap: Zap maintains the elements in sorted order based on the key. The elements are automatically sorted when they are inserted or modified.

5. Element Retrieval:

Seq: To retrieve an element from Seq, the index position or the iterator pointing to the element needs to be known.

Zap: To retrieve an element from Zap, only the key associated with the element needs to be known.

6. Memory Usage:

Seq: Seq typically uses more memory as compared to Zap because it stores additional information for efficient random access to elements.

Zap: Zap typically uses less memory as compared to Seq because it does not store additional information for random access to elements.

In Summary, Seq is a sequence container that allows duplicates, supports sequential iteration, does not provide built-in sorting, requires index position or iterator for element retrieval, and uses more memory. On the other hand, Zap is an associative container that does not allow duplicate keys, supports iteration over key-value pairs, maintains sorted order, requires only the key for element retrieval, and uses less memory.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Seq
Seq
Zap
Zap

Seq is a self-hosted server for structured log search, analysis, and alerting. It can be hosted on Windows or Linux/Docker, and has integrations for most popular structured logging libraries.

Zap takes a different approach. It includes a reflection-free, zero-allocation JSON encoder, and the base Logger strives to avoid serialization overhead and allocations wherever possible. By building the high-level SugaredLogger on that foundation, zap lets users choose when they need to count every allocation and when they'd prefer a more familiar, loosely typed API.

log search; alerting; dashboarding; charting
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
23.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
134
Stacks
10
Followers
140
Followers
33
Votes
26
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Easy to install and configure
  • 6
    Easy to use
  • 4
    Flexible query language
  • 3
    Beautiful charts and dashboards
  • 3
    Extensive plug-ins and integrations
Cons
  • 1
    This is a library tied to seq log storage
  • 1
    It is not free
No community feedback yet
Integrations
.NET
.NET
Python
Python
Node.js
Node.js
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
ASP.NET Core
ASP.NET Core
Ruby
Ruby
Java
Java
Slack
Slack
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
Serilog
Serilog
Golang
Golang

What are some alternatives to Seq, Zap?

Loki

Loki

Loki is a horizontally-scalable, highly-available, multi-tenant log aggregation system inspired by Prometheus. It is designed to be very cost effective and easy to operate, as it does not index the contents of the logs, but rather a set of labels for each log stream.

Log4j

Log4j

It is an open source logging framework. With this tool – logging behavior can be controlled by editing a configuration file only without touching the application binary and can be used to store the Selenium Automation flow logs.

Castle Core

Castle Core

It provides common Castle Project abstractions including logging services. It also features Castle DynamicProxy a lightweight runtime proxy generator, and Castle DictionaryAdapter.

Bunyan

Bunyan

It is a simple and fast JSON logging module for node.js services. It has extensible streams system for controlling where log records go (to a stream, to a file, log file rotation, etc.)

Fluent Bit

Fluent Bit

It is a super fast, lightweight, and highly scalable logging and metrics processor and forwarder. It is the preferred choice for cloud and containerized environments.

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for Mac and iOS.

uno

uno

We built uno, a small tool similar to uniq (the UNIX CLI tool that removes duplicates) - but with fuzziness. uno considers two lines to be equal if their edit distance is less than a specified threshold, by default set to 30%. It reads from stdin and prints the deduplicated lines to stdout.

NanoLog

NanoLog

It is an extremely performant nanosecond scale logging system for C++ that exposes a simple printf-like API and achieves over 80 million logs/second at a median latency of just over 7 nanoseconds.

SwiftyBeaver

SwiftyBeaver

It is Swift-based logging framework for iOS and macOS. It has different types of log messages where also we can filter logs to make bug checking even easier and has a free license plan.

LogDevice

LogDevice

LogDevice is a scalable and fault tolerant distributed log system. While a file-system stores and serves data organized as files, a log system stores and delivers data organized as logs. The log can be viewed as a record-oriented, append-only, and trimmable file.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana