StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Orm
  5. SQLAlchemy vs Sequelize

SQLAlchemy vs Sequelize

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy
Stacks1.6K
Followers511
Votes7
GitHub Stars3.5K
Forks878
Sequelize
Sequelize
Stacks1.0K
Followers1.4K
Votes143
GitHub Stars30.2K
Forks4.3K

SQLAlchemy vs Sequelize: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this document, we will discuss the key differences between SQLAlchemy and Sequelize, which are both popular ORM tools used for database management. These differences will help you understand the unique features and functionalities offered by each of these tools.

  1. Database Support: SQLAlchemy supports a wide range of database systems including PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, Oracle, and Microsoft SQL Server. On the other hand, Sequelize primarily focuses on supporting the JavaScript ecosystem and is commonly used with databases such as PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQLite, and Microsoft SQL Server.

  2. Language Compatibility: SQLAlchemy is primarily built for Python applications and provides a rich set of features that are specifically designed for Python developers. Sequelize, on the other hand, is a JavaScript ORM tool that is developed for Node.js applications, making it an ideal choice for JavaScript developers.

  3. API Style: SQLAlchemy follows a more traditional object-oriented approach, allowing developers to interact with the database through classes and objects. It provides a powerful querying API, which is useful for complex database operations. Sequelize, on the other hand, follows a promise-based approach and provides a simpler API for database operations, making it easier to work with asynchronous code and handle callbacks.

  4. Model Definition: In SQLAlchemy, the model definition is done using classes, allowing developers to define a schema by extending the base class and defining attributes for each column. Sequelize uses JavaScript objects to define models, making it easier to define relationships between tables and perform data validations using built-in data types.

  5. Migration Support: SQLAlchemy provides a powerful migration framework called Alembic, which allows developers to manage database schema changes and perform database migrations easily. Sequelize, on the other hand, has its own migration tool called "Sequelize CLI," which provides similar functionality for managing database schema changes.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: SQLAlchemy has been around for a longer time and has a larger community and ecosystem compared to Sequelize. This means that there are more resources, plugins, and community support available for SQLAlchemy, making it easier for developers to find solutions and get help when needed. On the other hand, Sequelize has a growing community and is widely used in the JavaScript ecosystem, especially for Node.js applications.

In Summary, SQLAlchemy and Sequelize differ in terms of the databases they support, the programming languages they are compatible with, the API style they follow, the model definition approaches they use, the migration support they provide, and the size of their community and ecosystem. Understanding these differences will help you choose the right ORM tool based on your project's requirements and the programming language you are using.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

SQLAlchemy
SQLAlchemy
Sequelize
Sequelize

SQLAlchemy is the Python SQL toolkit and Object Relational Mapper that gives application developers the full power and flexibility of SQL.

Sequelize is a promise-based ORM for Node.js and io.js. It supports the dialects PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite and MSSQL and features solid transaction support, relations, read replication and more.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
3.5K
GitHub Stars
30.2K
GitHub Forks
878
GitHub Forks
4.3K
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
1.0K
Followers
511
Followers
1.4K
Votes
7
Votes
143
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Open Source
Cons
  • 2
    Documentation
Pros
  • 42
    Good ORM for node.js
  • 31
    Easy setup
  • 21
    Support MySQL & MariaDB, PostgreSQL, MSSQL, Sqlite
  • 14
    Open source
  • 13
    Free
Cons
  • 30
    Docs are awful
  • 10
    Relations can be confusing
Integrations
Python
Python
SQLite
SQLite
Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Node.js
Node.js
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
MySQL
MySQL
MariaDB
MariaDB
io.js
io.js

What are some alternatives to SQLAlchemy, Sequelize?

Prisma

Prisma

Prisma is an open-source database toolkit. It replaces traditional ORMs and makes database access easy with an auto-generated query builder for TypeScript & Node.js.

Hibernate

Hibernate

Hibernate is a suite of open source projects around domain models. The flagship project is Hibernate ORM, the Object Relational Mapper.

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2

Doctrine 2 sits on top of a powerful database abstraction layer (DBAL). One of its key features is the option to write database queries in a proprietary object oriented SQL dialect called Doctrine Query Language (DQL), inspired by Hibernates HQL.

MikroORM

MikroORM

TypeScript ORM for Node.js based on Data Mapper, Unit of Work and Identity Map patterns. Supports MongoDB, MySQL, MariaDB, PostgreSQL and SQLite databases.

Entity Framework

Entity Framework

It is an object-relational mapper that enables .NET developers to work with relational data using domain-specific objects. It eliminates the need for most of the data-access code that developers usually need to write.

peewee

peewee

A small, expressive orm, written in python (2.6+, 3.2+), with built-in support for sqlite, mysql and postgresql and special extensions like hstore.

MyBatis

MyBatis

It is a first class persistence framework with support for custom SQL, stored procedures and advanced mappings. It eliminates almost all of the JDBC code and manual setting of parameters and retrieval of results. It can use simple XML or Annotations for configuration and map primitives, Map interfaces and Java POJOs (Plain Old Java Objects) to database records.

Entity Framework Core

Entity Framework Core

It is a lightweight, extensible, open source and cross-platform version of the popular Entity Framework data access technology. It can serve as an object-relational mapper (O/RM), enabling .NET developers to work with a database using .NET objects, and eliminating the need for most of the data-access code they usually need to write.

Dapper

Dapper

It is an object-relational mapping product for the Microsoft.NET platform: it provides a framework for mapping an object-oriented domain model to a traditional relational database.

NHibernate

NHibernate

It is a mature, open source object-relational mapper for the .NET framework. It's actively developed, fully featured and used in thousands of successful projects.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase