Smarty vs TypeScript

Overview

TypeScript

Stacks105.1K

Followers74.2K

Votes503

GitHub Stars106.6K

Forks13.1K

Smarty

Stacks3.2K

Followers71

Votes0

Smarty vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Introduction: In software development, Smarty and TypeScript play vital roles in enhancing the efficiency of web applications. Both languages have their unique features and functionalities that cater to different aspects of web development.

Syntax and Purpose: Smarty is a template engine used for web development, primarily for separating PHP and HTML code. It focuses on presentation logic and makes the code more readable and maintainable. On the other hand, TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing to JavaScript for better code organization, error detection, and tooling support.
Typed vs. Dynamic: TypeScript is statically typed, ensuring type safety during development, while Smarty is dynamically typed, allowing for more flexibility but potentially increasing the chances of runtime errors.
Compilation: TypeScript code needs to be compiled into JavaScript before it can run in a browser, offering optimization and error checking during the compilation process. Smarty, being a template engine, does not require compilation as it's executed on the server-side.
Community Support and Adoption: TypeScript has gained immense popularity and garnered a strong community support system with widespread adoption in the industry for building scalable web applications. Smarty, on the other hand, is more niche-oriented and commonly used in PHP projects that require a clear separation of layout and logic.
Type Inference: TypeScript offers powerful type inference capabilities that can infer types based on how the code is written, reducing the need for explicit type annotations. Smarty, due to its nature as a template engine, does not have type inference capabilities.
Tooling and Development Environment: TypeScript comes with advanced tooling support through IDEs like Visual Studio Code, providing features like IntelliSense, code navigation, and refactoring tools. Smarty, being a template engine, does not have as extensive tooling and development environment support as TypeScript.

In Summary, while Smarty focuses on template logic and separation of concerns for PHP-based projects, TypeScript offers static typing, powerful tooling, and broad community adoption for developing scalable JavaScript applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on TypeScript, Smarty

Peter

May 17, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

incredible developer tooling and community support
actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

135k views135k

Comments

Jarvis

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

TypeScript

Flow (JS)

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

168k views168k

Comments

David

VP Engineering at Trolley

May 16, 2019

Reviewon

JavaScript

Flow (JS)

TypeScript

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

173k views173k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

TypeScript	Smarty
TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.	Facilitating the separation of presentation (HTML/CSS) from application logic. This implies that PHP code is application logic, and is separated from the presentation
Statistics
GitHub Stars 106.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 13.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 105.1K	Stacks 3.2K
Followers 74.2K	Followers 71
Votes 503	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 173 More intuitive and type safe javascript 105 Type safe 80 JavaScript superset 48 The best AltJS ever 27 Best AltJS for BackEnd Cons 5 Code may look heavy and confusing 4 Hype	No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to TypeScript, Smarty?

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Elixir

Elixir leverages the Erlang VM, known for running low-latency, distributed and fault-tolerant systems, while also being successfully used in web development and the embedded software domain.

Related Comparisons

Smarty vs TypeScript: What are the differences?

Syntax and Purpose: Smarty is a template engine used for web development, primarily for separating PHP and HTML code. It focuses on presentation logic and makes the code more readable and maintainable. On the other hand, TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that adds static typing to JavaScript for better code organization, error detection, and tooling support.
Typed vs. Dynamic: TypeScript is statically typed, ensuring type safety during development, while Smarty is dynamically typed, allowing for more flexibility but potentially increasing the chances of runtime errors.
Compilation: TypeScript code needs to be compiled into JavaScript before it can run in a browser, offering optimization and error checking during the compilation process. Smarty, being a template engine, does not require compilation as it's executed on the server-side.
Community Support and Adoption: TypeScript has gained immense popularity and garnered a strong community support system with widespread adoption in the industry for building scalable web applications. Smarty, on the other hand, is more niche-oriented and commonly used in PHP projects that require a clear separation of layout and logic.
Type Inference: TypeScript offers powerful type inference capabilities that can infer types based on how the code is written, reducing the need for explicit type annotations. Smarty, due to its nature as a template engine, does not have type inference capabilities.
Tooling and Development Environment: TypeScript comes with advanced tooling support through IDEs like Visual Studio Code, providing features like IntelliSense, code navigation, and refactoring tools. Smarty, being a template engine, does not have as extensive tooling and development environment support as TypeScript.

Smarty vs TypeScript

Overview