StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. SourceLevel vs Stylelint

SourceLevel vs Stylelint

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Stylelint
Stylelint
Stacks1.6K
Followers100
Votes6
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks986
SourceLevel
SourceLevel
Stacks8
Followers11
Votes0

SourceLevel vs Stylelint: What are the differences?

Introduction: In the world of web development, SourceLevel and Stylelint are two popular tools used for code analysis and formatting. Let's explore the key differences between SourceLevel and Stylelint.

  1. Language Support: SourceLevel supports a wide range of programming languages including Ruby, Python, JavaScript, and TypeScript, whereas Stylelint is primarily focused on CSS and its preprocessors like Sass and Less.

  2. Focus on Code Quality: SourceLevel not only checks for syntax errors but also performs in-depth code analysis to improve code quality and maintainability, while Stylelint is more focused on enforcing consistent styling rules for CSS.

  3. Integration with IDEs: SourceLevel provides integrations with popular code editors and IDEs like VS Code and Sublime Text, allowing developers to get real-time feedback, whereas Stylelint may require additional setup or plugins to work seamlessly within an IDE.

  4. Community Support: Stylelint has a larger community of users and contributors, resulting in a more extensive collection of plugins and configurations available, whereas SourceLevel may have more specialized features tailored to specific languages or frameworks.

  5. Configuration Flexibility: Stylelint offers a highly customizable configuration setup, allowing developers to define specific rules and ignore certain patterns, whereas SourceLevel may have a more opinionated configuration out of the box.

  6. Primary Use Case: SourceLevel is often used for analyzing and monitoring the overall code quality of a project, making it suitable for teams and projects with a focus on maintainability and scalability, while Stylelint is commonly used for enforcing and standardizing CSS styles within a codebase.

In Summary, SourceLevel is a versatile code analysis tool supporting multiple languages and focusing on code quality, while Stylelint specializes in enforcing CSS styling rules with a strong community and configuration flexibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Stylelint, SourceLevel

Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 10, 2020

Review

To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.

You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as is_paid, get_name and set_name. In their places, we use directly paid?, name, and name=.

My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.

Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a #linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.

116k views116k
Comments
Carlos
Carlos

Mar 14, 2020

Needs adviceonPrettierPrettierESLintESLintgulpgulp

Scenario: I want to integrate Prettier in our code base which is currently using ESLint (for .js and .scss both). The project is using gulp.

It doesn't feel quite right to me to use ESLint, I wonder if it would be better to use Stylelint or Sass Lint instead.

I completed integrating ESLint + Prettier, Planning to do the same with [ Stylelint || Sasslint || EsLint] + Prettier.

And have gulp 'fix' on file save (Watcher).

Any recommendation is appreciated.

465k views465k
Comments
Budi
Budi

Programmer

Aug 19, 2020

Review

I think you scan skip MongoDB for now and focussing on creating web component with Reactjs or Vue, I would also recommend to use TypeScript for type hinting support.

For styling, learn CSS first then upgrade to SASS/SCSS or LESS (pick one as mostly same concept) to make CSS more maintainable.

Also to improve your skill on both sectors, install linters if available. For TypeScipt, there are TSLint and for styling, i think there are Stylint. Linter will help you adapt to make a clean code and understand how other peoples usually styled their code.

41.6k views41.6k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Stylelint
Stylelint
SourceLevel
SourceLevel

A mighty, modern CSS linter that helps you enforce consistent conventions and avoid errors in your stylesheets.

Pull Request metrics for data-driven teams SourceLevel provides metrics and insights from GitHub and GitLab, including Lead Time, Throughput, Engagement, and Collaboration.

-
Real-time data; Pull Request Metrics; Merge Request Metrics; GitLab Analytics; GitHub Analytics; DORA Metrics; DevOps Metrics; Lead Time; Throughput; Engagement; Code Review; Collaboration;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
986
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.6K
Stacks
8
Followers
100
Followers
11
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 5
    Great way to lint your CSS or SCSS
  • 1
    Only complains about real problems
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
GitLab
GitLab
GitHub
GitHub

What are some alternatives to Stylelint, SourceLevel?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana