StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Apache Tomcat vs Spring Boot

Apache Tomcat vs Spring Boot

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Stacks16.9K
Followers12.6K
Votes201
GitHub Stars8.0K
Forks5.3K
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Stacks26.7K
Followers24.3K
Votes1.0K
GitHub Stars78.9K
Forks41.6K

Apache Tomcat vs Spring Boot: What are the differences?

Apache Tomcat and Spring Boot are both popular frameworks used for developing Java-based web applications. Let's explore the key differences between them.

  1. Deployment Properties: Apache Tomcat is a servlet container that requires a separate web server, such as Apache HTTP Server, to handle HTTP requests. On the other hand, Spring Boot is an embeddable web server that can run standalone without external dependencies. This means that Spring Boot provides an all-in-one solution for deploying web applications, whereas Apache Tomcat requires additional configuration for deployment.

  2. Configuration: Apache Tomcat requires a separate XML configuration file (server.xml) for specifying various settings related to server, connectors, and resources. Spring Boot, however, uses a convention-over-configuration approach, where most of the settings are automatically inferred based on project dependencies and configuration files like application.properties or application.yml. This makes it easier and quicker to configure a Spring Boot application compared to Apache Tomcat.

  3. Dependency Management: Apache Tomcat is primarily a servlet container and does not provide built-in support for dependency management. Developers need to manually manage dependencies by including them in the web application's lib directory. Spring Boot, on the other hand, comes with built-in dependency management using Maven or Gradle. It provides a powerful dependency injection mechanism and easily resolves and includes dependencies, making it more convenient for developers to manage project dependencies.

  4. Convention over Configuration: Spring Boot follows a "convention over configuration" paradigm, where defaults and conventions are used to minimize configuration. It automatically configures many aspects of the application, such as database connection, logging, and transaction management, based on established conventions and sensible defaults. Apache Tomcat, on the other hand, requires explicit configuration for each aspect of the application.

  5. Ecosystem: Apache Tomcat has been around for a long time and has a mature ecosystem with a large community of users and contributors. It has extensive documentation and a wide range of resources available. Spring Boot, being a relatively newer framework, has a rapidly growing ecosystem with strong community support. It benefits from the extensive Spring ecosystem, including support for various Spring projects such as Spring Data, Spring Security, and Spring Integration, which makes it easier to integrate with other technologies and frameworks.

  6. Component Framework: Apache Tomcat is primarily a servlet container and focuses on the execution of Java servlets and JavaServer Pages (JSP). However, Spring Boot is built on top of the Spring framework, which provides a comprehensive suite of features and modules for building enterprise-level applications. Spring Boot includes many additional features such as dependency injection, AOP (Aspect-Oriented Programming), MVC (Model-View-Controller) framework, and support for various architectural patterns like REST, Microservices, and Messaging.

In summary, while Apache Tomcat is a servlet container that requires a separate web server, Spring Boot is an embeddable web server that provides an all-in-one solution for deployment. Spring Boot also simplifies configuration, dependency management, and leverages the extensive Spring ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Apache Tomcat, Spring Boot

Eva
Eva

Fullstack developer

Jul 28, 2020

Needs adviceonJavaJavaSpring BootSpring BootJavaScriptJavaScript

Hello, I am a fullstack web developer. I have been working for a company with Java/ Spring Boot and client-side JavaScript(mainly jQuery, some AngularJS) for the past 4 years. As I wish to now work as a freelancer, I am faced with a dilemma: which stack to choose given my current knowledge and the state of the market?

I've heard PHP is very popular in the freelance world. I don't know PHP. However, I'm sure it wouldn't be difficult to learn since it has many similarities with Java (OOP). It seems to me that Laravel has similarities with Spring Boot (it's MVC and OOP). Also, people say Laravel works well with Vue.js, which is my favorite JS framework.

On the other hand, I already know the Javascript language, and I like Vue.js, so I figure I could go the fullstack Javascript route with ExpressJS. However, I am not sure if these techs are ripe for freelancing (with regards to RAD, stability, reliability, security, costs, etc.) Is it true that Express is almost always used with MongoDB? Because my experience is mostly with SQL databases.

The projects I would like to work on are custom web applications/websites for small businesses. I have developed custom ERPs before and found that Java was a good fit, except for it taking a long time to develop. I cannot make a choice, and I am constantly switching between trying PHP and Node.js/Express. Any real-world advice would be welcome! I would love to find a stack that I enjoy while doing meaningful freelance coding.

826k views826k
Comments
Hari
Hari

Mar 3, 2020

Needs advice

I was in a situation where I have to configure 40 RHEL servers 20 each for Apache HTTP Server and Tomcat server. My task was to

  1. configure LVM with required logical volumes, format and mount for HTTP and Tomcat servers accordingly.
  2. Install apache and tomcat.
  3. Generate and apply selfsigned certs to http server.
  4. Modify default ports on Tomcat to different ports.
  5. Create users on RHEL for application support team.
  6. other administrative tasks like, start, stop and restart HTTP and Tomcat services.

I have utilized the power of ansible for all these tasks, which made it easy and manageable.

419k views419k
Comments
Slimane
Slimane

Jul 9, 2020

Needs adviceonSpring BootSpring BootNestJSNestJSNode.jsNode.js

I am currently planning to build a project from scratch. I will be using Angular as front-end framework, but for the back-end I am not sure which framework to use between Spring Boot and NestJS. I have worked with Spring Boot before, but my new project contains a lot of I/O operations, in fact it will show a daily report. I thought about the new Spring Web Reactive Framework but given the idea that Node.js is the most popular on handling non blocking I/O I am planning to start learning NestJS since it is based on Angular philosophy and TypeScript which I am familiar with. Looking forward to hear from you dear Community.

917k views917k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat
Spring Boot
Spring Boot

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
8.0K
GitHub Stars
78.9K
GitHub Forks
5.3K
GitHub Forks
41.6K
Stacks
16.9K
Stacks
26.7K
Followers
12.6K
Followers
24.3K
Votes
201
Votes
1.0K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 79
    Easy
  • 72
    Java
  • 49
    Popular
  • 1
    Spring web
Cons
  • 3
    Blocking - each http request block a thread
  • 2
    Easy to set up
Pros
  • 149
    Powerful and handy
  • 134
    Easy setup
  • 128
    Java
  • 90
    Spring
  • 85
    Fast
Cons
  • 23
    Heavy weight
  • 18
    Annotation ceremony
  • 13
    Java
  • 11
    Many config files needed
  • 5
    Reactive
Integrations
No integrations available
Spring
Spring
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Apache Tomcat, Spring Boot?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase