StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. API Tools
  4. File Uploads
  5. Uppy vs tus.io

Uppy vs tus.io

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Uppy
Uppy
Stacks92
Followers142
Votes6
GitHub Stars30.4K
Forks2.1K
tus.io
tus.io
Stacks11
Followers31
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.7K
Forks108

Uppy vs tus.io: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Uppy is an open-source file uploader for web applications, while tus.io is a protocol for resumable file uploads. Both Uppy and tus.io provide solutions for handling file uploads in web applications, but there are key differences between the two.

  1. Integration: Uppy is a complete file uploader that can be easily integrated into web applications with just a few lines of code. It provides a user-friendly interface for selecting and uploading files. On the other hand, tus.io is a protocol that can be implemented by developers to handle resumable file uploads. It provides a set of guidelines and specifications that can be used to build resumable upload functionality.

  2. Upload Options: Uppy offers various upload options and plugins that can be customized based on the requirements of the application. It supports direct uploads to cloud storage providers like Google Drive and Dropbox, as well as traditional uploads to a server. tus.io, on the other hand, focuses solely on the file transfer protocol and does not provide built-in support for cloud storage providers.

  3. Error Handling: Uppy provides comprehensive error handling and recovery mechanisms, allowing users to resume failed or interrupted uploads. It also offers features like automatic retrying and pausing/resuming uploads. tus.io also supports resumable uploads, but the error handling mechanism may need to be implemented by the developer using the protocol.

  4. Compatibility: Uppy is designed to work across different platforms and browsers. It is built using modern web technologies and supports features like drag and drop, image previews, and progress indicators. tus.io is a protocol that is platform and language-agnostic, allowing it to be used in various environments and frameworks.

  5. Community and Support: Uppy has an active and growing community of developers who contribute to its development and provide support. It is backed by the open-source community, with regular updates and bug fixes. tus.io also has an active community, but being a protocol, it relies on developers implementing the protocol to provide support and updates.

  6. Implementation Complexity: Uppy provides a straightforward and easy-to-use API for integrating file upload functionality into web applications. It abstracts away the complexities of handling file uploads and provides a simple interface for developers. tus.io, being a protocol, requires developers to implement the protocol in their applications, which may require more effort and expertise.

In summary, Uppy is a complete file uploader with easy integration and rich features, while tus.io is a protocol for resumable file uploads that can be implemented by developers. Uppy provides a comprehensive user interface and various upload options, while tus.io focuses on the file transfer protocol.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Uppy
Uppy
tus.io
tus.io

Uppy is a sleek modular file uploader for web browsers. Add it to your app with one line of code, or build a custom version with just the plugins you need via Webpack/Browserify. 100% open source, backed by a company (Transloadit).

Open protocol for resumable file uploads

React (Native) support (planned);ES6;Modular setup;Drag & Drop;Aware of encoding/processing; Copy & Paste; Encoding; Resumable File Uploads; Themable, with a beautiful default;Webcam;Import from Dropbox; Import from Google Drive; Import from Instagram
HTTP-based;Production-ready;Open source;Minimalistic design;Extensible;Community-owned;Backed by Vimeo & Transloadit
Statistics
GitHub Stars
30.4K
GitHub Stars
1.7K
GitHub Forks
2.1K
GitHub Forks
108
Stacks
92
Stacks
11
Followers
142
Followers
31
Votes
6
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Copy & Paste support
  • 3
    Open Source & Self Hosted
Cons
  • 1
    Takes time to configure
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Dropbox
Dropbox
Transloadit
Transloadit
Google Drive
Google Drive
Transloadit
Transloadit
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
Google Cloud Storage
Google Cloud Storage

What are some alternatives to Uppy, tus.io?

Uploadcare

Uploadcare

Uploadcare is file management platform and a CDN for user-generated content. It is a robust file API for uploading, managing, processing, rendering, optimizing, and delivering users’ content.

Transloadit

Transloadit

Transloadit handles file uploading & file processing for your websites and mobile apps. We can process video, audio, images and documents.

Bytescale

Bytescale

Bytescale is the best way to serve images, videos, and audio for web apps. Includes: Fast CDN, Storage, and Media Processing APIs.

Filestack

Filestack

Filepicker helps developers connect to their users' content. Connect, Store, and Process any file from anywhere on the Internet.

CarrierWave

CarrierWave

This gem provides a simple and extremely flexible way to upload files from Ruby applications. It works well with Rack based web applications, such as Ruby on Rails.

Paperclip

Paperclip

It is intended as an easy file attachment library for ActiveRecord. The intent behind it was to keep setup as easy as possible and to treat files as much like other attributes as possible.

FilePond

FilePond

A JavaScript library that can upload anything you throw at it, optimizes images for faster uploads and offers a great, accessible, silky smooth user experience.

Shrine

Shrine

Shrine implements a plugin system analogous to Roda’s and Sequel’s. Shrine ships with over 25 plugins, which together provide a great arsenal of features. Where CarrierWave and other file upload libraries favor complex class-level DSLs, Shrine favours simple instance-level interface.

CameraTag

CameraTag

With one line of code you can easily start collecting videos for applications ranging from video-comments to talent competitions, political action, virtual interviews, talent scouting and more.<br>

Flatfile

Flatfile

The drop-in data importer that implements in hours, not weeks. Give your users the import experience you always dreamed of, but never had time to build.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase