StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Vertica vs Vitess

Vertica vs Vitess

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Vertica
Vertica
Stacks88
Followers120
Votes16
Vitess
Vitess
Stacks66
Followers166
Votes0

Vertica vs Vitess: What are the differences?

Introduction:
In the realm of database management systems, Vertica and Vitess are two notable players that cater to different niches of users. Understanding the key differences between these two technologies can help organizations make informed decisions about their data architecture choices.

1. **Scalability**: Vertica is a distributed analytical database that excels in handling large volumes of data for high-speed analytics. It is designed to scale easily by adding more nodes to the cluster. In contrast, Vitess is a database clustering system primarily used for scaling MySQL horizontally by sharding the data. While Vertica focuses on analytical workloads, Vitess caters more towards serving transactional workloads with MySQL compatibility.

2. **Data Model**: Vertica uses a columnar storage strategy, which means data is stored and queried by columns instead of rows. This approach significantly improves the performance of analytics queries that require processing large amounts of data. On the other hand, Vitess maintains a traditional row-based structure typical of relational databases like MySQL. This design choice influences the types of workloads each system is optimized for.

3. **Consistency vs. Availability**: Vertica prioritizes consistency over availability, aiming to guarantee that every query provides the most up-to-date information at the expense of potential downtime during maintenance or failure. In contrast, Vitess leans towards availability by employing techniques like sharding and replication to ensure that the system remains accessible even if certain nodes fail. This trade-off between consistency and availability is crucial for users depending on real-time data.

4. **Use Cases**: Vertica is commonly utilized in data warehousing scenarios where users need to analyze vast amounts of historical data to derive insights and make informed business decisions. In contrast, Vitess is favored in online transaction processing (OLTP) applications where low latency queries and high availability are critical. Understanding the specific use case requirements is essential in selecting the appropriate technology.

5. **Data Manipulation Language (DML)**: Vertica supports a wide range of SQL functionalities and is optimized for complex analytical queries involving aggregations and joins on large datasets. On the other hand, Vitess provides MySQL compatibility, allowing users to leverage familiar DML statements for OLTP operations. This distinction in DML capabilities influences how developers interact with each system based on their query requirements and existing skill sets.

6. **Query Optimization**: Vertica employs various optimization techniques such as vectorized query execution and projections to enhance query performance on large datasets. In contrast, Vitess focuses on query routing and decomposition strategies to distribute queries efficiently across sharded MySQL instances. Understanding the nuances of query optimization in each system is crucial for achieving optimal performance in different use cases.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between Vertica and Vitess in terms of scalability, data model, consistency vs. availability, use cases, DML capabilities, and query optimization can help organizations make informed decisions about selecting the right database technology for their specific requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Vertica
Vertica
Vitess
Vitess

It provides a best-in-class, unified analytics platform that will forever be independent from underlying infrastructure.

It is a database solution for deploying, scaling and managing large clusters of MySQL instances. It’s architected to run as effectively in a public or private cloud architecture as it does on dedicated hardware. It combines and extends many important MySQL features with the scalability of a NoSQL database.

Analyze All of Your Data. No longer move data or settle for siloed views;Achieve Scale and Performance;Fear of growing data volumes and users is a thing of the past;Future-Proof Your Analytics
Scalability; Connection pooling; Manageability
Statistics
Stacks
88
Stacks
66
Followers
120
Followers
166
Votes
16
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Shared nothing or shared everything architecture
  • 1
    Partition pruning and predicate push down on Parquet
  • 1
    Vertica is the only product which offers partition prun
  • 1
    Query-Optimized Storage
  • 1
    Fully automated Database Designer tool
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Oracle
Oracle
Golang
Golang
MongoDB
MongoDB
MySQL
MySQL
Sass
Sass
Mode
Mode
PowerBI
PowerBI
Tableau
Tableau
Talend
Talend
Amazon RDS
Amazon RDS
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
MySQL
MySQL

What are some alternatives to Vertica, Vitess?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase