Xen Orchestra vs XenServer

Overview

XenServer

Stacks52

Followers57

Votes0

Xen Orchestra

Stacks13

Followers19

Votes0

GitHub Stars901

Forks291

Xen Orchestra vs XenServer: What are the differences?

Licensing: Xen Orchestra is an open-source project with a Community Edition that is free to use, while XenServer requires a paid license for certain features and support.
Management Interface: Xen Orchestra provides a web-based management interface for managing XenServer infrastructure, while XenServer relies on XenCenter, a Windows-based management tool.
Feature Set: XenServer offers a comprehensive set of features for virtualization, including live migration and high availability, while Xen Orchestra focuses more on providing a user-friendly interface and additional tools for managing XenServer.
Support: Xen Orchestra has a community forum for support and collaboration, while XenServer offers professional support options through Citrix or its partners.
Customization: Xen Orchestra allows for customization of the interface and functionality through plugins and extensions, whereas XenServer has limited options for customization.
Integration: Xen Orchestra can integrate with third-party tools and services more easily through its API and plugin system, compared to XenServer which has more limited integration options.

In Summary, Xen Orchestra and XenServer differ in licensing, management interface, feature set, support, customization, and integration capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

XenServer	Xen Orchestra
It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.	It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.
-	Xen management; Easy-to-use; Fast; Easy migration
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 901
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 291
Stacks 52	Stacks 13
Followers 57	Followers 19
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
No integrations available	Packer CloudConvert ScaleGrid RunAbove Neptune.io Morpheus

What are some alternatives to XenServer, Xen Orchestra?

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Ant Design

An enterprise-class UI design language and React-based implementation. Graceful UI components out of the box, base on React Component. A npm + webpack + babel + dora + dva development framework.

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

React Rainbow

It is a collection of components that will reliably help you build your application in a snap. More than 60 components built on top of React.

Chakra UI

It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.

MD Bootstrap

It is a UI kit built with an aim to cut the time developers need to create their websites by taking all the best features from vanilla Bootstrap and enhancing them with a distinctive design from Google.

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

uWSGI

The uWSGI project aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services.

Related Comparisons

Xen Orchestra vs XenServer: What are the differences?

Licensing: Xen Orchestra is an open-source project with a Community Edition that is free to use, while XenServer requires a paid license for certain features and support.
Management Interface: Xen Orchestra provides a web-based management interface for managing XenServer infrastructure, while XenServer relies on XenCenter, a Windows-based management tool.
Feature Set: XenServer offers a comprehensive set of features for virtualization, including live migration and high availability, while Xen Orchestra focuses more on providing a user-friendly interface and additional tools for managing XenServer.
Support: Xen Orchestra has a community forum for support and collaboration, while XenServer offers professional support options through Citrix or its partners.
Customization: Xen Orchestra allows for customization of the interface and functionality through plugins and extensions, whereas XenServer has limited options for customization.
Integration: Xen Orchestra can integrate with third-party tools and services more easily through its API and plugin system, compared to XenServer which has more limited integration options.

In Summary, Xen Orchestra and XenServer differ in licensing, management interface, feature set, support, customization, and integration capabilities.

Xen Orchestra vs XenServer

Overview